Full text of "1998 charter school applications"

See other formats

|V\A^. tiDlv^^ C35/;

31E0bb DEfll St.7M M

Roxbury College Preparatory

Charter School

Roxbury, MA

Application for a Public School Charter

Submitted to Commonwealth of Massachusetts

January 5, 1998

0^ ijj.jX-''

;r"-!n f,

l.l>l:i

i¥i

JAN 5 ,52g

Massachusetts Department of Education

L Applicant Information Sheet

(This sheet must be attached to the prospectus and final application.)

This application is for a (check one):

0^ Commonwealth Charter D Horace Mann Charter

(Please Type)

Name of Proposed Charter School

School Address (if known) .

Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School

School Location (City/Town) Roxbury, MA

Name of Group Applying for the Charter.
Contact Person ^^^^ ^^^^^^

N/A

Address

City.

c/o Roger Harris, Principal James P. Timilty Public School

205 Roxbury Street
Roxbury

Daytime Tel: ( ^17 ^ 285-5209

State ^

Zip.

02119

Fax: C

N/A

E-mail:

EvanRudall@AOL . COM

The proposed school will open in the fall of school year: EI 1998-99 D 1999-00

School Year

Grade Levels

Total Student
Enrollment

First Year

5,6

144

Second Year

5-7

216

Third Year

5-8

288

Fourth Year

5-9

' 360

Fifth Year

5-10

432

Will this school be a Regional Charter School ? D Yes Q No

School Districts from which students are expected to come (use additional sheets if
necessary):

Boston

Application for a Public School Charter 1997-1998

Massachusetts Department of Education

III. Commonwealth Charter School
Certification Statement

Proposed Charter School Name Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School
Proposed School Location (City /Town) Roxbury, MA

I hereby certify that the information submitted in this application is true to the
best of my knowledge and belief; and further, I understand that, if awarded a
charter, the proposed school shallbe open to all students, on a space available
basis, and shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national ori^n, creed,
sex, ethnicity, sexual orientation, mental orphysical disability, age, ancestry,
athletic performance, special need,or proficiency in the English language, and
academic achievement. This is a true statement, made under the penalties of
perjury.

A^^S^Perso n ^^^ ^O^f^VX^ pate N /^A^

Print/T5^e Name Evan Rudall

Application for a Public School Charter 1997-1998 23

I. ABSTRACT

Mission

Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School, a K-12 school, prepares its students to
enter, succeed in, and graduate from college. The school's rigorous academic program is enhanced
through teacher collaboration and external reviews conducted with the James P. Timilty Public
Middle School and the Boston Public Schools. Local universities, community-based
organizations, and families provide academic and social support for students through vibrant
extended-day and weekend programming.

Educational Philosophy

The RCP curriculum is based on the Modem Red School House design and the project's tenet that
"all students can learn and attain high standards in core academic subjects. Children simply vary in
the time they need to learn and the ways they learn best." ' RCP's educational program reflects the
philosophy that all students are entitled to and can succeed in college preparatory programs when:

1) the curriculum is challenging and is connected to students' lives through relevant themes;

2) teachers are provided with the time and structure to collaborate to improve curriculum and
instruction;

3) internal and external support structures ensure the academic, social, and physical well-
being of students.

Key Goals and Expected Outcomes

•100% of students are expected to apply and be accepted to college and are supported beyond high
school through an Alumni Network and winter/summer workshops.

•100% of students visit colleges, take classes co-taught by college professors in the junior year, are
prepared for college entrance exams, and receive support throughout the college
application/fmancial aid process and beyond.

•100% of graduates will meet or exceed all performance standards established by RCP, the
Massachusetts Department of Education, and the Boston Public Schools and will therefore be
prepared to enter and succeed in college.

•As a whole, RCP students are expected to outscore BPS and Massachusetts averages on the
Stanford 9 Test and Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System. •

•100% of students will take college entrance exams, including the PS AT during the sophomore and
junior years and the SAT during the junior and senior years. As a whole, RCP students are
expected to outscore BPS and Massachusetts averages on all college entrance exams.

•100% of students are expected to participate in after-school, weekend, or summer enrichment
programs.

•The student attendance rate will meet or exceed 95%.

•100% of administrators will establish individual goals before every academic year and meet or
exceed the school's rigorous expectations for administrators.

•100% of parents/guardians will participate in their children's education through the development
and maintenance of an Individual Education Compact and by attending school functions.

•100% of students become increasingly self-aware through studies of their personal, family, and
community histories and through the development and articulation of future goals.

•100% of students are computer-literate, access the internet, and use electronic mail.

II. NARRATIVE

1. MISSION STATEMENT

2. STATEMENT OF NEED

Significant numbers of students in Boston and other cities underachieve and drop out of school
because they lack hope and a sense of purpose. In addition to confronting the dramatic physical,
social, emotional, and intellectual changes associated with childhood and adolescence, today's
urban students face sizable social challenges. It is not surprising that many of these young people
struggle in school, question its relevancy to their lives, suffer from a lack of self esteem, and crave
structure and support. Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School is designed to provide its
students with the direction and sense of purpose they need to envision and pursue future
opportunities.

Many students in Roxbury face racial and economic challenges and lack opportunities that more
privileged youth take for granted. While most middle and upper-class children expect to attend
college, many Roxbury students are told implicitly and explicitly that higher education is not an
option. In 1997, for instance, 67% of students at Roxbury-based elementary schools scored
below grade level in reading on the Stanford 9 Achievement Test; 71% of these students scored
below grade level in math. Numbers show that as students progress, they fall even further behind.
By middle school, an average of 78% and 94% of students at Roxbury-based schools scored
below grade level on the reading and math portions of the test, respectively.' These numbers
indicate that Roxbury schools do not provide their students with prerequisite skills that would
allow them to consider college as a viable option. In order to level the educational and economic
playing fields, Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School exists to prepare its students to enter
and succeed in college.

The need and desire for educational altematives in Roxbury also is evidenced by the 800-student
waiting list at Roxbury' s James P. Timilty Public School. Relatedly, there are no local college
preparatory schools available to all students independent of past academic and testing performance.
RCP would provide a much-needed high-quality option for K-12 students who otherwise do not
have access to a rigorous college preparatory curriculum. The essential K-12 format allows for
consistency and coherency in our curriculum and programming and provides teachers the
opportunity to develop strong relationships with students and their families and to share
information about students across grade levels.

RCP welcomes the autonomy and accountability that are inherent in charter school status. Free
from many traditional rules and regulations, RCP develops its own rigorous and coherent K-12
curriculum, performance standards, assessment methods, daily and yearly schedules, governing
bodies, and community partnerships. In addition, RCP is free to hire teachers and administrators
who are willing to be reflective about their teaching practices and to collaborate in order to ensure
student academic achievement. The school also benefits from its unique model of collaboration
with the James P. Timilty Public School and the Boston Public Schools. This partnership
facilitates the sharing of best practices among teachers and allows RCP teachers and administrators
to learn from successful BPS schools. This kind of partnership is both desirable and necessary to
best serve public school students.

3. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM

CURRICULUM OVERVIEW

The RCP curriculum is based on the Modem Red School House design and the project's tenet that
"all students can learn and attain high standards in core academic subjects. Children simply vary in
the time they need to leam and the ways they leam best."^ RCP's educational program reflects the
philosophy that all students are entitled to and can succeed in college preparatory programs when:

1) the curriculum is challenging and is connected to students' lives through relevant themes;

2) teachers are provided with the time and structure to collaborate to improve curriculum and
instruction;

3) internal and external support structures ensure the academic, social, and physical well-
being of students.

RCP's college prep program is unique in that:

•few other college prep programs exist in or near Roxbury;

•it is open to any student, independent of past performance and without entrance exams;

•the school is committed to preparing every student for college;

•it is neighborhood-based and is geared toward meeting Roxbury 's needs;

•preparation for college occurs inside and outside of the classroom;

•its student standards are unusually high;

•it has multiple intemal and extemal support structures to ensure student success;

•the school day is extended;

•the integrated curriculum engages students through themes relevant to their lives;

•the curriculum development structure is well-designed and comprehensive;

•all grade-level teacher-teams collaborate extensively in Critical Friends Groups;

•the K-12 structure enables the school to create a coherent K-12 curriculum, develop

consistent procedures and expectations across grade levels, and maintain relationships

with students and families for extended periods of time.

RCP's school design is expected to influence and be influenced by other public schools. Through
the school's extensive partnership with the James P. Timilty Public School and through
Assessment Teams composed of district school representatives, RCP looks forward to contributing
to and benefiting from Boston Public Schools and other public schools.

A CHALLENGING AND RELEVANT CURRICULUM

RCP's primary goal is to ensure that its students are prepared to enter, succeed in, and graduate
from college through mastery of the school's unusually high standards. RCP has established
student standards based on Modem Red Schoolhouse standards, the Massachusetts Curriculum
Frameworks, Boston Public Schools Citywide Leaming Standards, and established K-12 college
prep programs. RCP students are expected to meet or exceed all performance standards
established by RCP, the Massachusetts Department of Education, and the Boston Public Schools.
A partial list of RCP's standards can be found in Appendix A.

By graduation, RCP students are expected to:

•meet or exceed State academic standards and the school's student performance

standards;

•compare the United States political system to other past and present political systems;
•compare and contrast major economic systems;
•understand historical events from a variety of perspectives;
•analyze and describe the history of current social and political issues;
•demonstrate awareness of the social, cultural, religious, racial, ethnic, and economic

diversity that exists in Roxbury, Boston, Massachusetts, the U.S., and the world.

•interpret U.S. and world literature within a social and historical context;

•compose an insightful and well- written essay;

•communicate information, opinions, and experiences effectively when speaking

publicly;
•use research tools available in college libraries and implement a variety of strategies for

finding and recording information when conducting research;
•apply scientific knowledge and methods to solve problems and conduct experiments;
•apply mathematical knowledge and skill to solve problems;
•communicate effectively in two languages, one of which must be English;
•be computer-literate, access the intemet, and use electronic mail;
•work well with others;
•become increasingly self-aware through studies of their personal, family, and

community histories;

•contribute to and build a relationship with Roxbury and surrounding communities;
•identify academic, personal, and professional opportunities and to plan and act

accordingly;

•participate effectively in internships;
•apply to and be accepted to college.

Student objectives for each grade level will be published and sent to parents prior to the start of
each school year. Students must demonstrate mastery of these objectives in order to proceed to the
following grade level. Extensive school-year and summer support is provided (as described later
in this section) to ensure that students meet the school's standards and to address skill deficiencies
students have upon entrance to RCP.

RCP's High School Course of Study can be found in Appendix B. Although RCP's curriculum
includes a broad range of content, the school is committed to engaging students through a
curriculum that reflects their experiences and the diversity of their backgrounds. Studies are made
relevant through themes connected to students' lives. These themes might include race, class,
gender, social institutions, family, friendship, religion, justice, independence, democracy,
education, power, leadership, community, individuality, identity, media, violence, conflict,
environment, and health. Such themes connect the disciplines and provide context, but do not
threaten the objectives established for each course. In fact, RCP's founders believe that students
are more likely to achieve objectives when connections are made between course work and issues
relevant to students' lives. Linda Darling-Hammond of Columbia University writes that cognitive
research demonstrates that "learning is a process of making meaning out of new or unfaniiliar
events in light of familiar ideas or experiences. Leamers construct knowledge as they build
cognitive maps for organizing and interpreting new information. Effective teachers help students
make such maps by drawing connections among different concepts and between new ideas and
learners' prior experiences."^

CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

The following timeline has been established to ensure constant development of the RCP
curriculum:

Februarv. 1998 - August. 1998

•RCP will hire a consultant, ideally from Modem Red Schoolhouse, to support the efforts of
teachers and administrators to:

•collaborate effectively;

•refine student standards;

•further develop the school's scope and sequence;

•develop units that integrate skills and content;

•ensure that the school's student standards are reflected in grade-level and subject
goals, integrated units, daily lessons, and assessments."^

•Teachers will be hired with the understanding that they will attend six weeks of summer training
and curriculum development sessions.

•With the help of a curriculum consultant, teachers will work in grade-level teacher-teams to refine
established student standards for each class, further develop the school's scope and sequence,
develop units that integrate skills and content, refme assessment rubrics, and ensure that student
standards are reflected in grade-level and subject goals, integrated units, daily lessons, and
assessments.

September 1998 - Ongoing

•Teachers and administrators will continue to work with a curriculum consultant.

•In order to encourage student achievement through reflective teaching, improved practice, and
teacher collaboration, RCP grade-level teacher-teams will form "Critical Friends Groups." RCP
Critical Friends observe one another's teaching and teams meet for more than six hours each week
to share observations, examine teacher work, analyze student work, design integrated thematic
units, and discuss student issues. RCP has established a Critical Friends Network with the James
P. Timilty Public School to allow teachers to observe teaching and share ideas across schools; the
Network will be piloted with one sixth grade team from each school during the 1998-1999 school
year in Friday afternoon professional development sessions, through e-mail correspondence, and
during eight-week summer planning sessions. Please see Appendices C and D for further detail.

•Grade-level Lead Teachers will be trained to facilitate CFG meetings and will ensure that
assessment rubrics are developed and shared with students before instructional units begin.

•Academic departments will be established to evaluate and coordinate content and skill goals in
each subject area. Departments will meet at least once each month and will be chaired by teachers
who sit on the Curriculum Committee.

•A Curriculum Committee, with representatives from each grade-level and department, will review
the curriculum on an ongoing basis to ensure that content and skill standards support the school's
mission to prepare students for college and are carefully coordinated within each grade level,
across grade levels, and across departments. The Curriculum Committee will consider grade-level
and department recommendations and goals and make final recommendations to the School
Director(s).

•A Curriculum Coordinator will head the Curriculum Committee, participate in grade-level
meetings, seek and share curriculum and instructional practices from other schools and
professional journals, and facilitate professional development and the Critical Friends Network.

•After student progress is assessed with periodic Capstone and Watershed Assessments (explained
in "Assessment"), curriculum evaluation will be conducted in light of student performance.
Teachers, grade-level teams, academic departments, the Curriculum Committee, and
administrators are expected to identify student standards, verify that the standards are consistent
with the school's mission, and evaluate whether students are meeting standards. If students are
not meeting standards, teachers and administrators will attempt to identify the root of problem
(i.e. insufficient time to master skills, lack of student interest or motivation, poor teaching
methods, etc.).^ If students appear to be meeting standards with ease, teachers and administrators
will raise the standards.

•RCP will purchase a curriculum management software package to help ensure that standards,
curriculum, instruction, and assessments are appropriately aligned.

•Established curriculum frameworks, student standards, integrated units, and assessment rubrics
will be refined in summer department and grade-level meetings.

•Teachers and administrators will be evaluated to ensure that the curriculum is implemented
effectively. Evaluation methods are described in Section 3.

Student Assessment

In order to ensure mastery of individual course and grade level objectives, RCP students are
required to pass their classes and corresponding competency tests before proceeding to the
following grade level.

To measure student achievement of objectives effectively, RCP's student assessment system will:

•be based on the school's clearly defined student standards;

•be refined by grade-level teacher teams;

•include rubrics for all units and significant assignments;

•ensure that rubrics clearly define measures of success and are provided to students in
advance of instruction;

•include real-world tasks;

•involve a variety of assessment techniques conducted by individual teachers, grade-
level teams, departments, and across the whole school;

•include all assessments required of other schools by the Massachusetts Department of
Education and the Boston Public Schools.

A variety of assessment tools are used to ensure that students are meeting the school's standards
and are prepared for college-level work by graduation:

Standardized Tests

RCP will administer the Stanford 9 each year to all students as one measure to assess student
readiness for grade-level and college-level work. All newly enrolled students will take the
Stanford 9 at the beginning of the school year to establish a baseline score, against which future
scores can be measured. RCP also will administer the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment
System and all other testing and portfolio requirements established by the Massachusetts Board of
Education and Boston Public Schools for students in other public schools.

Individual Education Compacts

In conjunction with the Modem Red Schoolhouse school design, each RCP's student progress will
be monitored by an Individual Education Compact (lEC). The lEC is an agreement among the
student, parents, and advisor that establishes measurable goals for the student and identifies
responsibilities of the parents and teachers for helping the student reach these goals.^

Capstone and Watershed Assessments

RCP has established individual course and grade-level objectives. "Capstone Assessments,"
including evaluation of student written work and public performances, are used throughout the
year to measure mastery of course objectives. Yearly "Watershed Assessments," consisting of
multiple Capstone Assessments and subject exams, evaluate mastery of grade-level objectives.^

Portfolios

Portfolios contain collections of student work from kindergarten through twelfth grade. Students,
teachers, and outsiders periodically use collected work as a benchmark to measure student progress
toward the school's clearly defined standards and toward the Individual Education Compact. The
Portfolios include Personal Plans, autobiographies, family histories, evaluations of internships,
tests, essays, in-class work, and projects evaluated by both teachers and students.

Progress Reports

Six times each year, students receive extensive written evaluations from their advisors. These
narrative and prescriptive reports include grades and input from all of a student's teachers to
evaluate student progress toward the school's clearly defined standards and toward the Individual
Education Compact.

Public School and Community Assessment Teams

RCP has formed partnerships with the James P. Timilty Public Middle School and Boston Public
School administrators to establish Public School and Community Assessment Teams. Each year,
representatives from Timilty, other Boston Pubic Schools, the BPS central office, other charter
schools, institutions of higher education, and surrounding communities will assess RCP's
progress. Assessment teams will evaluate student work and performances, teaching and
instructional methods, curriculum, assessments, governance structure, school climate, and special
programs. These outside evaluators will help RCP measure student progress toward objectives,
provide RCP with much-needed feedback, and affect change in other schools.

INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL SUPPORT STRUCTURES

To ensure the academic, physical, social, and emotional well-being of its students, RCP relies on
internal support structures, community ties, and institutional partnerships.

Internal Support Structures

Because many students may arrive at RCP with skills significantly below grade-level, the school
must make a concerted effort to ensure that all of its students meet the school's unusually high
standards. Thus, in addition to the rigorous curriculum described above, the following facets
support the school's mission to prepare all students to enter, succeed in, and graduate from college:

•The school day is extended until 4:00 PM at RCP. Students, in school more than 20% longer
than required by law, spend increased time mastering academics.

•RCP students receive a tremendous amount of individual attention. Class size at RCP is limited to
1 8 students and grade-level teachers teach no more than 72 students each year, ensuring that
teachers know the needs of their students. In addition, during the middle school years, 5th grade
teachers remain with their students through 6th grade and 7th grade teachers remain with their
teachers through 8th grade.

•Each day, for one hour, students have a silent "Reading Period." Although the period is
scheduled to enhance reading skills, grade-level teacher-teams may decide to use the Reading
Period to enhance additional skills, address other student needs, or provide individual attention to
students.

•Each night, through the 8th grade year, RCP parents/guardians are expected to check homework
and sign student assignment books when homework has been completed.

•Students who are unable to complete homework satisfactorily or who are struggling in class are
required to stay after school to study and to ensure achievement.

•RCP will hire teachers trained to provide Special Education and Bilingual Education services. The
school also will seek the help of Reading Specialists.

•Given the setting of RCP and its mission, the school expects to attract applications from
outstanding teachers who reflect the backgrounds and experiences of its students. RCP's
founders believe that such teachers will have an immeasurably positive impact on the school's
students.

•RCP's administrative staff provides much-needed flexibility and support. In addition to
conducting outreach and development work, the RCP co-directors attend grade-level meetings and
are accessible to teachers and students on a daily basis. The school's Director of Community
Relations and After-School Programs ensures that students receive sufficient support as the school
day ends.

•If RCP cannot secure pro-bono services (with the help of Harvard Project on Schooling and
Children and other sources), the school will hire a part-time counselor to help students and
families address social and emotional concems.

•Partnerships with Harvard University and Northeastern University offer access to university
students willing and able to serve as tutors and mentors in RCP's after-school tutoring program.

•RCP's Empower Boston program, modeled after the nationwide Summerbridge program,
prepares middle school students for high school and attracts high school and college students to
the teaching profession. At Empower Boston, rising sixth and seventh grade students (from
RCP, Timilty, and other public schools) further their learning and become better-prepared for
rigorous high school programs through summer enrichment classes taught by talented and
dedicated local high school and college students. The summer classes are skill-based and engage
students through exposure to new topics and through teaching done by positive young role
models. Many of the high school and college students will serve as tutors throughout the school
year.

•RCP students will have access to a number of after-school, weekend, and summer programs to
strengthen academic and social skills. For instance, RCP has been invited to join Timilty students
in the Citizen Schools program. In the Citizen Schools program, students become apprentices in
intense summer and school-year sessions.

•Through the Citizen Schools program, Empower Boston, after-school tutoring, and community
organizations such as Concemed Black Men, RCP students will be mentored by positive role
models who encourage students to succeed in school. RCP's founders believe that such
relationships are central to success during the turbulent and impressionable adolescent years.

•In order to support RCP graduates, the school will establish an Alumni Network. Summer and
winter institutes enable alumni to retain close ties to the school, the community, and each other.

•All RCP students are required to wear uniforms. The school expects that its safe and orderly
environment, serious and purposeful mission, high expectations, and caring teachers will motivate
students.

•RCP's curriculum development process and teacher-team structure, described above, help ensure
the academic success of students.

•RCP is considering the feasibility of establishing a partnership with a university to train teacher
interns.

Students with Special Needs and Students Who Do Not Speak English with Proficiency
RCP students with special needs and students who do not speak English with proficiency will be
served in accordance with state and federal law. The RCP community enthusiastically embraces
the philosophy of responsible inclusion and the belief that all students have the right to be
supported by resources and staff to achieve in mainstream classes whenever possible. RCP will
employ the following systems and strategies to meet the needs of students with special needs and
students who do not speak English with proficiency.

•RCP will employ a certified special education teacher to serve as a Case Manager to ensure that
every student with an DEP is receiving appropriate services and that the school is in compliance
with state and federal laws at all times. This person's duties will include, but not be limited to,
maintaining all special education records in accordance with state and federal law, scheduling all
annual lEP reviews, organizing professional development for teaching staff, assisting in making
appropriate curriculum and instruction modifications, evaluating other special education support
staff, and working to ensure a high-quality education for RCP students with special needs.

•RCP will employ certified special education teachers to ensure that learning disabilities are
addressed in accordance with the most up-to-date and philosophically sound practice. The duties
of these teachers will include, but not be limited to, teaching core academic subjects to a
mainstream class while making necessary modifications for students with lEPs, rewriting lEPs
whenever appropriate, serving as academic advisors to special education students, working in
grade-level teacher-teams to ensure the successful education experience of all RCP students,
especially those students with special needs.

•RCP will employ or secure the pro-bono services of a counselor to meet the needs of students
entitled to counseling as indicated in their lEPs. The counselor will meet with teachers and
administrators to support the successful inclusion of students with special needs. The counselor
will be available to meet with students regardless of lEP status.

•Every RCP student with an EEP will take home a check-in report at the end of every week. The
weekly check-in report will allow teachers to comment on student performance and will provide
much-needed frequent communication between home and school.

•RCP will contract with outside agencies on an as-needed basis to meet the needs of students
entitled to speech therapy and/or occupation therapy as indicated in their lEPs.

•RCP faculty will be trained by Advisory Board member Caroline Olivier. Ms. Olivier is a
founding member and former Dean of Landmark College, which specializes in leaming
disabilities.

•RCP will employ certified bilingual education teachers to ensure that the school complies with
state and federal laws at all times and provides a high-quality education for RCP students who do
not speak English with proficiency. Certified bilingual teachers work with grade-level teacher-
teams to share the most up-to-date and philosophically sound practices.

•A Special Education and Bilingual Education Team will meet on a weekly basis to assess and
direct the school's approach to bilingual education and to students with special needs. This team
will be chaired by the school's Curriculum Coordinator and will be charged with ensuring the
overall quality of special education and bilingual education. The team also will serve as the first
step in the referral process for students who exhibit a possible need for greater services.

•As described above in the "Internal Support Structures" section, RCP will offer daily
opportunities for all students to receive extra assistance in all core academic areas.

The Daily and Yearly Schedule

To accommodate parents with children in other public schools, the RCP calendar mirrors that of
Boston Public Schools. However, extended leaming occurs before school, during expanded
school hours, after school, in occasional and optional Saturday sessions, and through summer
opportunities.

Daily Schedule

The school day is extended until 4:00 PM at RCP. Students, in school more than 20% longer than
required by law, spend increased time mastering academics. RCP's flexible daily schedule enables
grade-level teams to gather at-will for large blocks of interdisciplinary instructional time; the
blocked schedule also allows grade-level teacher-teams to meet for approximately six hours each
week to integrate curriculum, improve practice, and discuss student issues. A sample weekly
schedule is included as Appendix E.

RCP opens at 7 AM each morning. From 7 AM until 8 AM, students have the opportunity to sing
with the school choir, work with computers, receive academic tutoring, benefit from academic
enrichment, or study in a quiet space.

RCP is open until 6 PM Monday through Thursday. During after-school hours, students can
participate on the basketball, track, or drill/step teams, work with computers, create a student
newspaper, practice a musical instrument, attend a Student Council meeting, exercise their artistic
talents, create a skit or presentation for Assembly, receive tutoring, benefit from academic
enrichment, or study in a quiet space. Partnerships with Harvard University, Northeastern
University, and Roxbury Community College offer access to university students willing and able
to serve as tutors and mentors in RCP's after-school tutoring program. RCP students, invited to
participate in the Citizen Schools after-school program, become apprentices of talented community
members. Through the Citizen Schools program, RCP's tutoring program, and community

organizations such as Concerned Black Men, after-school hours and weekends provide RCP
students with the opportunity to be mentored by positive role models who encourage students to
succeed in school.

Summer Opportunities
Please see Appendix G.

Institutional Partnerships

Parent/Guardian Involvement

Given the demands on many of today's parents, RCP aims to ensure that students succeed even if
families are unable to provide significant academic support. However, RCP aims to encourage
parent involvement through:

•the creation of an Individual Education Compact that establishes measurable goals for

each student and identifies responsibilities of the parents and teachers for helping the

student reach these goals.

•a requirement that all parents "sign off' on homework each night;
•an Advisory structure that keeps parents and teachers in close contact about positive

student progress and issues of concem;
•one-on-one meetings with parents and students as needed;
•parent/teacher conferences at least three times each year;
•a parent representative on the school's Board of Directors;
•Parent Nights that introduce parents to teachers and students' classes;
•Saturday and evening programs for students and parents;
•a Parent and Community Involvement Committee that encourages and coordinates the

participation of parents and community members;

•volunteer opportunities, including recruiting and meeting with prospective families;
•Parent/Student Book Clubs designed to promote discussion among students and

parents from RCP and Timilty;
•"Coffee Houses" designed to showcase the academic and personal talents of students.

Collaboration with the James P. Timiltv Public School'

Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School and the James P. Timilty Public School strive to
create a model for positive and rewarding collaborations between charter and district schools. The
two schools will:

•form Public School and Community Assessment Teams to evaluate student work and
performances, teaching and instructional methods, curriculum, assessments,
governance structure, school climate, and special programs at both schools.
Representatives from Timilty, other Boston Pubic Schools, the BPS central office,
other charter schools, institutions of higher education, and surrounding communities
will assess school progress and provide significant and sorely-needed opportunities
for cross-fertilization between charter and district schools;

•establish a Critical Friends Network to develop standards, curriculum, and
assessments and to improve teaching at both schools. Inter- and intra-school
collaboration will take place in daily team meetings, in Friday afternoon professional
development sessions for both schools, and through e-mail correspondence. Critical
Friends Group meetings will be facilitated by trained teachers and experienced
curriculum coordinators. Please see Appendices C and D for more details;

•ensure that administrators share problem-solving strategies and conduct long-range
planning sessions. Communication will take place through phone calls, e-mail, and
periodically scheduled meetings;

•participate jointly in the Empower Boston program, founded and hosted by RCP.
Modeled after the nationwide Summerbridge program, Empower Boston prepares
middle school students for high school and attracts high school and college students to
the teaching profession. At Empower Boston, rising sixth and seventh grade students
(from RCP, Timilty, and other public schools) further their learning and become
better-prepared for rigorous high school programs through summer enrichment classes
taught by talented and dedicated local high school and college students;

•participate jointly in the Citizen Schools program. RCP and Timilty students become
apprentices in intense six week summer sessions and after-school and Saturday
programs throughout the school year;

•invite parents from both schools to participate in Saturday and evening programs for
students and parents. Book Clubs will promote discussion among students and
parents from RCP and Timilty. "Coffee Houses" will showcase the academic and
personal talents of students;

•establish exchange programs; students will visit and attend classes at their sister
schools. Timilty eighth grade students will visit RCP high school classes

•compete athletically.

•hope to extend the Critical Friends Network and other collaborative ventures to more
district and charter schools in the future. Ultimately, RCP and Timilty hope to host a
conference to bridge the gap that exists between charter and district schools.

Harvard Project on Schooling and Children

RCP has formed a partnership with Harvard Project on Schooling and Children. Drawing upon
the vast resources of Harvard's School of Business, School of Education, JFK School of
Government, School of Law, and Faculty of Arts and Sciences, the Project will identify
individuals willing to support the design, implementation, and management of RCP.

Other Partnerships

RCP also has established partnerships with Northeastern University, Roxbury Community
College, YouthBuild Boston, Concerned Black Men, Bridging Bridges, and Summerbridge
National. Letters of support are attached in Appendix H.

4. ACCOUNTABILITY

RCP will measure success through a variety of internal and extemal methods. Student progress
will be assessed by teachers, outside evaluators, and standardized tests. Teachers will be evaluated
and held accountable by administrators. Administrators will be evaluated and held accountable by
the Board of Directors.

Defining and Measuring Success

Academic Performance Indicators

•100% of students are expected to apply and be accepted to college and are supported beyond high

school through an Alumni Network and winter/summer workshops. College acceptance rates will

be monitored by the college counselor.

•100% of graduates will meet or exceed all performance standards established by RCP, the
Massachusetts Department of Education, and the Boston Public Schools and will therefore be

prepared to enter and succeed in college. Student achievement will be measured through the
school's assessment methods described above.

•RCP will administer the Stanford 9 Test each year to all students. All newly enrolled students will
take the Stanford 9 at the beginning of the school year to establish a baseline score, against which
future scores can be measured. RCP also will administer the Massachusetts Comprehensive
Assessment System and all other testing and portfolio requirements established by the
Massachusetts Board of Education and Boston Public Schools. As a whole, RCP students are
expected to outscore BPS and Massachusetts averages on all standardized tests.

•The Curriculum Coordinator, Curriculum Committee, principals, and academic departments will
assess the curriculum and student performance regularly to ensure that student standards are
consistent with the school's mission and are being realized.

Non-Academic Performance Indicators

•100% of students are expected to participate in after-school, weekend, or summer enrichment
programs.

•100% of students become increasingly self-aware through studies of their personal, family, and
community histories and through the development and articulation of future goals.

•100% of students are computer-literate, access the intemet, and use electronic mail.

•The student attendance rate will meet or exceed 95%.

•Graduation rates will exceed the rates of Boston and Massachusetts Public Schools.

•Dropout rates will be lower than the rates of Boston and Massachusetts Public Schools.

•100% of grade-level teacher teams will establish yearly goals, which include ensuring that
students meet grade-level objectives. Team portfolios, including notes from meetings and
collaborative planning, will document team efficacy and progress. Teacher-team progress toward
established goals will be evaluated by the Curriculum Coordinator, School Director(s), and Public
School and Community Assessment Teams.

•100% of teachers will work effectively within Critical Friends Groups to better curriculum and
instruction, establish individual goals before every academic year, and meet or exceed the school's
rigorous expectations for teachers. Teacher progress toward established goals will be evaluated
by the Curriculum Coordinator, School Director(s), and Public School and Community
Assessment Teams. The School Director(s) will fire teachers who, after having been warned and
supported, do not meet expectations.

•100% of administrators will establish individual goals before every academic year and meet or
exceed the school's rigorous expectations for administrators. Administrative performance will be
evaluated by the School Director(s) and by the Public School and Community Assessment Teams.
RCP's School Director(s) will fire administrators who, after having been warned and supported,
do not meet expectations. RCP's Board of Directors and the Public School and Community
Assessment Teams will evaluate the School Director(s)' performance. The Board of Directors
will fire School Directors who, after having been warned and supported, do not meet
expectations.

•100% of parents/guardians will participate in their children's education through the development
and maintenance of an Individual Education Compact and by attending school functions.

•At least 90% of students, parents, and teachers will give the school positive ratings and will
indicate that students' needs are being met. Students, parents, teachers, and staff will be surveyed
to determine levels of satisfaction.

•RCP's Director(s) will raise at least 10% of the school's revenue from private sources during the
school's first five years.

•The budget will be balanced every year. Yearly audits will assess the school's fiscal propriety.

•Each incoming class will be oversubscribed and a waiting list will be established.

Public School and Community Assessment Teams

RCP has formed partnerships with the James P. Timilty Public Middle School and Boston Public
School administrators to establish Public School and Community Assessment Teams. Each year,
representatives from Timilty, other Boston Pubic Schools, the BPS central office, other charter
schools, institutions of higher education, and surrounding communities will assess RCP's
progress. Assessment teams will evaluate student work and performances, teaching and
instructional methods, curriculum, assessments, organizational structure and leadership, school
climate, and special programs. In addition to providing RCP's Board of Directors, School
Directors, and teachers with much-needed feedback. Assessment Teams will provide significant
and sorely-needed opportunities for cross-fertilization between charter and district schools.

Ensuring Success

Through the multiple internal and external support structures mentioned in the "Internal and
External Support Structures" section and through the accountability system detailed above, RCP
will ensure success.

5. SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT

School Ethos

RCP is founded on the philosophy that all students are entitled to and can succeed in a college
preparatory education when provided with sufficient support and encouragement. RCP is
committed to providing an environment in which students are challenged and nurtured. Everyone
involved in the RCP community will help ensure that students are supported all day every day.

Discipline Policy

Given RCP's commitment to maintaining frequent communication with families, requiring
uniforms, providing positive mentors for students, and offering a rigorous and supportive
academic environment for its students, the school expects to encounter few significant discipline
issues. However, the RCP's Code of Conduct, developed in accordance with state and federal
law, will be published to inform the school's constituents about student discipline procedures.

Whenever possible, disciplinary matters will be handled by RCP teachers. Division Directors will
be informed of all student issues and will manage significant disciplinary matters. Any
recommendations for counseling, suspensions, or expulsions must be approved by the School
Director(s).

Students are subject to expulsion if found in possession of a dangerous weapon or controlled
substance on school premises or at school-related events. Students who assault school personnel
on school premises or at school-related events also are subject to expulsion.^

6. ENROLLMENT

Student Enrollment

RCP's K-12 structure will enable the school to create a coherent K-12 curriculum, develop
consistent procedures and expectations across grade levels, and maintain relationships with
students and families for extended periods of time. RCP plans to open with 60 fifth grade students
and 60 sixth grade students in 1998. Until the charter is reapproved, RCP will continue to add a
new fifth grade class each year. If RCP's charter is reapproved and once the school has access to
sufficient space, a lower school component will be added. Enrollment for the first five years is as
follows:

Year 1 : 72 5th & 72 6th = 144 students

Year 2: 72 5th, 72 6th, & 72 7th = 216 smdents

Year 3: 72 5th, 72 6th, 72 7th, & 72 8th = 288 students

Year 4: 72 5th, 72 6th, 72 7th, 72 8th, & 72 9th = 360 students

Year 5: 72 5th, 72 6th, 72 7th, 72 8th, 72 9th & 72 10th = 432 students

RCP expects to be oversubscribed each year. If oversubscribed, RCP will select students by
lottery without regard to past performance. All students who apply for admission will be included
in an admission lottery if the number of applicants exceeds capacity. A waiting list will be
established after the lottery is held.

In contrast to exam schools, RCP is committed to preparing any student to enter, succeed in, and
graduate from college. RCP will not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin,
creed, sex, ethnicity, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, age, ancestry, athletic
performance, special need, proficiency in the English language or a foreign language, or prior
academic achievement.

Student Recruitment

By law, RCP is open to any student residing in Boston. However, because RCP is designed to
become an integral part of the Roxbury community, most of the school's students are expected to
live in Roxbury.

Recruitment will be conducted city-wide, but will be concentrated in Roxbury. RCP will place
notices in newspapers, distribute fliers, and make announcements on the radio and at schools,
churches, and other neighborhood-based organizations; information will be available in both
Spanish and English. In addition, the school will require prospective students or families to attend
one of approximately ten formal informational meetings. These meetings will be held at a variety
of times to accommodate the varied schedules of parents and families.

7. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE

In order to establish accountability for student achievement, RCP has developed a governance
structure that clearly delineates responsibilities, lines of supervision, and information flow. The
governance structure is summarized in a chart in Appendix F. Key roles are described below and
in Appendix F.

Board of Directors

RCP will be governed by a board of directors that:

•hires, evaluates, and, if necessary, fires the School Director(s);
•ensures that the school adheres to its mission and sets policies;
•reviews and approves the school's programs and long-range plans;
•establishes fiscal policy and controls; approves the school's budget;

•ensures that the school has adequate resources; approves and assists with fundraising

efforts;

•helps to promote the school;

•nominates, orients, and evaluates its own board members. '°

The board of directors will represent a diversity of backgrounds and will reflect experience with
educational, financial, legal, political, real estate, community, development, and management
matters.

School DirectorCs)

Barring unforeseen circumstances, RCP's start-up phase will continue to be co-directed by Michele

Pierce and Evan Rudall. Ms. Pierce and Mr. Rudall have worked together on a variety of projects

during the past six years and model their current working relationship after Boston's Fenway

Middle College co-directorship and other successful partnerships. Although the decision-making

process is more complex in a co-directorship, such collaborations have the potential to yield rich

results.

RCP's School Director(s) will oversee, evaluate, and be held accountable for all school programs
and operations. The Board of Directors will establish rigorous performance standards for RCP's
School Director(s). If the Board's expectations are not met, the School's Director(s) will be fired.

The School Director(s) will:

•oversee, evaluate, and be held accountable for all school programs and operations;

•raise private funds;

•manage the budget;

•maintain communication with the Board of Directors;

•maintain communication with Beacon Education Management to manage school

finances and operations;

•articulate and model the school's values to students, parents, staff, and the community;
•build and maintain connections to community members and organizations;
•promote the school in the community and media;
•oversee student recruitment and enrollment;
•oversee faculty and staff recruitment and selection;
•oversee faculty and staff evaluation and management;
•be responsible for the hiring and firing of teachers and staff;
•oversee school-wide assessment, including facilitation of the Public School and

Community Assessment Teams;
•manage school-wide problem-solving, planning, and development sessions.

Business Services

RCP's business services will be provided by Beacon Education Management. Beacon will provide
accounting, general ledger, bookkeeping, and financial services, accounts payable and receivable
administration, insurance coordination, payroll processing and coordination, employee benefits
coordination, and other related services. Beacon also will develop a human resources system for
RCP and will coordinate the establishment of a National School Lunch Program. Beacon will
provide additional support in the areas of technology, curriculum development, professional
development, facility acquisition and management, and fundraising.

Other Key Roles

Other key roles are described in Appendix F.

Information Flow and Decision-Making

Ultimately, day-to-day decision-making authority is granted to the School Director(s). However,
RCP's founders believe that the school will be enriched by empowering all faculty and staff to
make decisions. Therefore, RCP's Director(s) will encourage teachers and staff to "innovate and
add value."' ' Several mechanisms are in place to ease the flow of information and to ensure
quality decision-making.

•Student progress is monitored on an ongoing basis through standardized tests, school-
developed assessments, and Public School and Community Assessment Teams. This
will inform RCP's School Director and Board of Directors as to whether or not
curricular, instructional, and other decisions are producing desired results.

•Teachers will have the authority to make curricular decisions, unless the School
Director(s) feel the decisions harm the school. Teacher-teams will make curriculum
recommendations to Department Heads and to the Curriculum Coordinator.
Department Heads and the Curriculum Coordinator will make recommendations to the
Curriculum Committee. The Curriculum Committee and Curriculum Coordinator will
make final recommendations to the School Director(s).

•Lead Teachers will inform Division Directors of student issues and disciplinary
matters. Division Directors will manage student issues and disciplinary matters. Any
recommendations for counseling, suspensions, or expulsions must be approved by the
School Director(s).

•The School Director(s) must approve all major curricular decisions, student counseling
referrals, and student suspensions or expulsions.

Although RCP's founders inherently trust the decision-making abilities of teachers and
administrators, the above-mentioned control mechanisms are designed to maintain control and
consistency as the school grows.

8. CAPACITY

Summary of Collective Experience

The founders of Roxbury Community College Preparatory Charter School form a group of
experienced educators, parents, and community leaders. The team includes teachers, principals,
and deans from elementary school, middle school, high school, and higher education. These
educators, each with five to thirty years of experience, have served and currently serve as teachers
and administrators in urban district schools, alternative public schools, independent schools, non-
profit academic enrichment programs, and universities. Founding and Board members represent
the Roxbury community and work in Boston Public Schools and the Private Industry Council.

Founders

Please see Appendix I for the resumes of RCP's founders and for a list of the

school's Advisors.

Partnerships

RCP has established partnerships with the James P. Timilty Public Middle School, Boston Public
Schools, Harvard Project on Schooling and Children, Northeastern University, YouthBuild
Boston, Concerned Black Men, Bridging Bridges, and Summerbridge National. Letters of
support are attached in Appendix H.

9. FACILITIES AND STUDENT TRANSPORTATION

Facilities

RCP has formed a partnership with YouthBuild Boston to secure and renovate a facility. A letter
of support detailing this relationship is attached in Appendix H.

Urban Edge, a community development corporation in Roxbury, also is supporting RCP's efforts
to locate potential sites. Urban Edge and RCP have identified the following facilities as
possibilities:

•690 Dudley Street
•59 Amory Street
•23 Heath Street

Renovations costs at these sites would be included in the reasonable lease price. Renovations and
leasing costs may be defrayed through RCP's partnership with YouthBuild Boston.

Transportation

RCP will utilize Boston Public Schools' transportation services for eligible students.

10. A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A STUDENT

"Come on Max, we're going to be late!" urges Danielle to her sleepy twin brother, as she hands
him a Nutribar to eat on the way to school. They have both been awake since 6:30 AM, to bathe
and put on their school uniforms. Their mother, Karen, sends them off with a kiss, and the day
begins. Max and Danielle walk a few short blocks to school, arriving by 7:15 AM. They part
ways quickly. Max goes down to the basement for choir rehearsal, and Danielle heads to the
computer lab to finish an essay on the contributions of John D. O'Bryant. She has been working
on this paper for two weeks, an eternity to a fifth grader, but her work is thorough and impressive.
She has done research at the public library and she has talked to her parents, who grew up in
Roxbury. Max is preparing for a statewide gospel competition the following Saturday, to which
transportation will be shared with RCP's sister school, the James P. Timilty Middle School. The
students in both choirs perform together regularly.

At 8: 10 AM, first period begins. Half of the students attend Humanities, while the other half attend
Math and Science. Max enters Mrs. Nagle's Humanities classroom, where there are fifteen desks
neatly placed. Often, when students arrive at school, they find Mrs. Nagle listening to jazz music,
writing at her desk, or talking with a student whom she has asked to "see." The students become
nervous when they are asked to come in early to see Mrs. Nagle; they fear that they are somehow
in trouble. What they each realize, in time, is that Mrs. Nagle will meet with every student in the
class, and for those ten minutes she is completely theirs. She asks questions about academic
interests, future aspirations, or weekend plans. "All she did was ask me some questions," Max
responded when his mother asked about his recent meeting with Mrs. Nagle. "She asked how I
read so fast. And she asked if I have ever read J.R.R. Tolkien, since I'm interested in sci-fi."

Mrs. Nagle is a veteran teacher of seventeen years, and while she is working with a new integrated
curriculum that she helped to design, she is confident and calm. "Good morning Mr. Sutton," she
greets Max. "Good morning," he smiles, always thinking of Mr. Sutton as his father. Mrs. Nagle
says she addresses all of her students this way out of respect, and to make them feel special. The
class starts as it does every morning, with a seven minute "freewrite." Each day, as the students
walk in, Mrs. Nagle writes a quotation on the board, often from the previous night's reading.
Students copy down the quote in their notebooks and then write anything that comes to mind.
Mrs. Nagle allows students to ease themselves into the school day with this quiet reflection.
Today's quote reads:

"Esperanza, you have come full circle. You will always be Mango Street ..."

Everyone in the room writes, including Mrs. Nagle. After seven minutes, Mrs. Nagle asks two
students, Ms. Jackson and Mr. Pola, to read their responses to the quotation. Ms. Jackson reads
what it means to have "a true sense of community," through growing up somewhere and returning
there to live as an adult. She writes about her house, where her mother also was raised. Without
missing a beat, Mr. Pola begins reading. The students know this drill, as it happens each day: two
students read without a verbal response from the class until both students have finished. Mr. Pola
writes about his older brother who has gone to college in New York, and what it is like when his
brother returns home for the holidays: "Some of his friends think he's all stuck up now, 'tryin' to
be white', but he says maybe they just don't know what he's doing or why." Mrs. Nagle smiles,
pleased that one of her students has brought this controversial issue to the table. The class spends
the next forty minutes discussing why learning is equated with "tryin' to be white." The students
are vocal and honest, they disagree and agree, they challenge the teacher and themselves. And, at
this end, as she always does, Mrs. Nagle brings the discussion back to House on Mango Street
and the quotation on the board The students are excited to read the next chapter that night.

Meanwhile, Danielle is in Math class. Unlike many girls her age, Danielle is an avid mathematician
and is anxious to share her abilities in class. Her teacher, Mr. Carr, is young, and his energy is
unceasing. Mr. Carr majored in Calculus at Morehouse after attending Boston Latin School. The
students are discussing their "investments" while checking today's stocks in The Wall Street
Journal . Danielle has chosen to invest her money in BellAtlantic, feeling that the new ad campaign
with James Earl Jones will heighten business. "I see that my stock has remained at the same level
for several days now," she observes. "What does that mean for your investment?" responds Mr.
Carr. " I'm going to sit tight for a little while, sometimes you have to be patient in this business."
All students discuss their investments in small groups and then record their predictions for future
gains and losses. The students do not know it yet, but Mr. Carr has arranged for the class to take a
day-trip to New York to see the stock market in action at the end of this unit. The class works
quickly, before they move on to Science class.

Ms. Elliot instructs the students to keep their backpacks closed and to find a pen. This is the last
day in their gravity explorations, and she wants to get started. Danielle quickly writes down her
name and address on an index card, as Ms. Elliot's science class heads for the courtyard. As a
culmination to their lab on the properties of gravity, students tie their index cards to balloons and
float them away. "We'll see if gravity can allow us to make some new pen pals," says Ms. Elliot.
"Then we'll spend the ten minutes before lunch finishing our lab write-ups."

After lunch, since it is Friday, students and teachers gather for Assembly to close out the week. As
usual, today's Assembly is run by a student, Nia Wambua, who has been practicing for days. She
asks the students to find their seats. Nia begins the Assembly with an affirmation that she has
written for the occasion: "I know that everything I leamed this week now belongs to me. I read
poems by Langston Hughes, Sonia Sanchez, and Marjorie Dambreville. These words now belong
to me. I did an experiment to find out my blood type, this information belongs to me. I am tired, I
worked hard, and this belongs to me." The auditorium erupts in applause. Nia makes a few
announcements about the upcoming week, and then asks for other announcements. Another
student, Phil Harris, comes to the front and plays a piece that he has composed on his saxophone.
He says it is a "conversation between a homeless woman and a middle class woman who meet in a
train station." This is inspired by Bluebirdbluebirdthroughmywindow, by Sonia Sanchez, which
he read in Mrs. Nagle' s class. Again, applause follows his performance. The last presentation is
by a teacher, Ms. Lightfoot, who recites a soliloquy from Othello. She shares this as an
introduction to upcoming studies. Nia excitedly dismisses the students for the weekend after
leading the crowd in a rousing rendition of the RCP cheer.

III. BUDGET. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND HUMAN RESOURCES

(limited to 5 pages)

1. BUDGET

See attached Budget.

2. BUDGET NARRATIVE

See attached Budget Narrative.

3. HUMAN RESOURCES

Number of Faculty to Be Hired in Year 1. 1998-99: 120 students

•2 FT School Directors

•8 FT teachers, including 2 Lead Teachers, 1 Bilingual specialist, & 1 SPED specialist

•2 .8 Spanish teachers

•1 .8 P.E. teacher and coach

•1 FT School Secretary

•Pro-bono or PT Nurse, Librarian, Technology Support Specialist, & Counselor

Number of Faculty to Be Hired in Year 5. 2002-03: 360 students

2 FT School Directors

20 FT teachers, including 5 Lead Teachers, 3 Bilingual specialists, & 3 SPED specialists
5 .8 Spanish teachers

3 .8 P.E. teachers and coaches
1 FT School Secretary

Pro-bono or PT Nurse, Librarian, Technology Support Specialist, & Counselor

1 FT Lower School Director and necessary teachers if school founds Lower School component

1 FT Middle School Director

1 FT Upper School Director

1 FT Curriculum Coordinator

1 FT Director of Community Relations and After-School Programs

1 FT College Counselor

1 FT Director of Critical Issues in Contemporary Society, Intemships, and Alumni Affairs

Hiring Criteria

In addition to providing positive recommendations, passing a background check, undergoing
RCP's interview process, providing writing samples, and, whenever possible, teaching a sample
lesson, faculty and staff must have the following credentials:

•School Director(s): Master's Degree, 5 or more years of teaching or related experience,
administrative and fundraising experience;

•Teachers: B.A. or B.S., 2 or more years of teaching or related experience;
•Lead Teachers: B.A. or B.S., 3 or more years of teaching or related experience;
•Curriculum Coordinator: Master's Degree, 5 or more years of teaching or related experience;

•Division Directors: Master's Degree, 5 or more years of teaching or related experience;
•Director of Community Relations and After-School Programs: B.A. or B.S., experienced in

community work;

•College Counselor: B.A. or B.S., 2 or more years of teaching or related experience;
•Director of Critical Issues in Contemporary Society, Internships, and Alumni Affairs: B.A. or

B.S., 2 or more years of teaching or related experience.

Salary Range for Teachers and Administrators

RCP will match Boston Public Schools' contracts for teachers and administrators, but will not pay
any teacher less than $40,000 each year, including compensation for summer work. During the
first year, salaries will be capped at $60,000.

Professional Development

Professional development at RCP will center around improving curriculum and instruction in
grade-level teacher teams, or "Critical Friends Groups." Each summer, and throughout the school
year, RCP teachers and administrators will work with a curriculum consultant to refine established
student standards for each class, further develop the school's scope and sequence, develop units
that integrate skills and content, refine assessment rubrics, and ensure that student standards are
reflected in grade-level and subject goals, integrated units, daily lessons, and assessments.

Evaluation of Faculty and Administrators

RCP teachers and administrators are evaluated for two different reasons: 1) to determine whether
teachers and administrators should be retained (evaluation); 2) to improve teacher and administrator
performance (supervision).'^

Evaluation of Teachers and Administrators

All RCP teachers are expected to work effectively within Critical Friends Groups, establish
individual goals before every academic year, and meet or exceed the school's rigorous expectations
for teachers. Each summer, RCP's School Director(s) and Curriculum Coordinator will meet with
teachers and a curriculum consultant to refine the school's criteria for instructional evaluation.
Instructional evaluation will be based on the attainment of student objectives and teacher goals,
observed teaching methods, and work contained in teacher portfolios (detailed course syllabus,
curricular material and individual lesson plans, feedback from Critical Friends and students,
assessment rubrics, samples of student work, etc.).

Each teacher's instructional and non-instructional performance is evaluated formally by the
Curriculum Coordinator and/or School Director(s) at least twice every year. After receiving formal
written evaluations, teachers meet with the appropriate evaluator. Ongoing evaluation enables the
School Director(s) to decide whether to retain or dismiss teachers. The School Director(s) will fire
teachers who, after having been warned and supported, do not meet expectations.

All RCP administrators are expected to establish individual goals before every academic year and
meet or exceed the school's rigorous expectations. Administrative performance will be evaluated
formally by the School Director(s) at least twice each year. RCP's School Director(s) will fire
administrators who, after having been warned and supported, do not meet expectations.

RCP's Board of Directors will evaluate School Directors' performance at least twice each year in
light of the school's rigorous expectations for School Directors. The Board will fire School
Directors who, after having been warned and supported, do not meet expectations.

Supervision of Teachers and Administrators

Supervision of teachers and administrators is intended to improve performance. Colleagues and
outside reviewers may participate in the supervision process. The Critical Friends structure and
Public School and Community Assessment Teams will encourage feedback and progress.

Projected Revenues and Expenditures
Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School

Start-Up Phase

Fiscal Year 1999

Fiscal Year 2000

Fiscal Year 2001 1 Fiscal Year 2002

2/98 - 8/98

I. Revenues

_. 1

Tuition

1,055,808.00

1.631.223.36

2.240.213.41 i $

2.884,274.77

Federal Start-Up Grant

40,000.00

40.000.00

Private Funds

25,000.00

100,000.00

100.000.00

100,000.00

Entitlements

72,000.00

108,000.00

144,000.00

180,000.00

Loan

80,000.00

Total Revenues

145,000.00

1,267,808.00

1,879,223.36

2,484,213.41

3,164,274.77

II. Expenditures

Professional Salaries

School Directors

42,000.00

120.000.00

124,800.00

129,792.00 1 $

134,983.68

Administrators

1 10,000.00

114,400.00

Teachers (FT)

360,000.00

561,600.00

778,752.00

1,012,377.60

Teachers (PT)

99,000.00

134.000.00

185,000.00

217,000.00

Special Needs Administration

72,000.00

108.000.00

144,000.00

180,000.00

Payroll Taxes

3,150.00

17,370.00

24.612.00

36,106.32

44,362.84

Benefits

5,250.00

60,000.00

84.000.00

120,000.00

144,000.00

Total Professional Salaries

8,400.00

728,370.00

1,037.012.00

1,503,650.32 $

1,847,124.12

Administrative Staff

Clerical

22,000.00

22.880.00

23.795.20

24,747.01

Custodial

20,000.00

20.800.00

21.632.00

22,497.28

PT Counselor

$15,000

$15,600

$16,224

$16,873

PT Nurse

$15,000

$15,600

$16,224

$16,873

PT Librarian

$10,000

$10,400

$10,816

$11,249

PT Technology Specialist

$10,000

$10,400

$10,816

$11,249

Payroll Taxes

6,900.00

7,176.00

7.463.04

7,761.56

Benefits

11,500.00

11,960.00

12,438.40 1 $

12,935.94

Total Administrative Staff

110.400.00

114,816.00

119,408.64 1 $

124,184.99

Facility

Rent

216,000.00

324,000.00

432,000.00

540,000.00

Debt Service

30,000.00

31.556.00

Utilities

28,800.00

43,200.00

57.600.00

72,000.00

Total Facility

274.800.00

397,200.00

521.156.00

612.000.00

Materials/Supplies

Textbooks

24.000.00

12,000.00

12.000.00 1 $

12.000.00

Instructional Equipment

14.400.00

21,600.00

28.800.00 1 $

36.000.00

Office/Classroom Technology

5.000.00

30.552.00

30,552.00

30.552.00 i $

30,552.00

Library

5.000.00

5,000.00

5.000.00 1 $

5,000.00

Office Furniture

. .._

1.000.00

1,500.00

2.000.00 j $

3,000.00

Classroom Furniture j

19.296.00

16,080.00

16.080.00

Total Materials/Supplies

5,000.00

94,248.00

86,732.00

94.432.00

102,632.00

Other Costs

Insurance

12,000.00

18,000.00

24.000.00

30,000.00

Business Services

18,000.00

24.000.00

24,000.00

Consultants

5,000.00

$ 5,000.00

Marketing/Development

3,000.00

3,000.00 f S

3.000.00

Staff Development/Training i

5,000.00

7.500.00

10,000.00

12,500,00

Transportation

14,400.00

21.600.00

28,800.00 1 $

36,000.00

Food Service

15,840.00

23.760.00

31,680.00

39,600.00

Curriculum Development i $

50.000.00

37,500.00

50,000.00

62,500.00

75,000.00

Printing and Copying

2,500.00

5,000.00

5,000.00 ! $

5,000.00

Student and Staff Recruitment

3,000.00

3,000.00 ! $

3,000.00 1 $

3,000.00

Travel/Transportation !

3.000.00

3,000.00

3,000.00 1 $

3,000.00

Telephone/Fax/Postage $

4,000.00

8,000.00

8.000.00

8,000.00 i $

8,000.00

Contingency

40.000.00

40,000.00 i $

100,000.00

Total Other Costs

59,500.00

129.740.00

205.860.00

247,980.00 1 $

344,100.00

Total Revenues

145,000.00

1,267,808.00

1,879,223.36

2,484,213.41 ! $

3,164,274.77

Previous Balance

72,100.00

2,350.00

39,953.36 i $

37,539.81

Total Expenditures! ^

72,900.00

1,337,558.00

1,841.620.00 < $

2,486,626.96 ! $

3,030,041.10

Balancei $

72,100.00 i $

2,350.00 1 $

39.953.36 1 $

37,539.81 $

171,773.48

Budget Narrative

Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School

I. Revenues

Tuition

$7,332 X enrollments of 144, 216, 288, 360. 3% yearly increase.

State Grants

$40,000 federal start-up grant for first 3 years.

Private Funds

Private funds raised each year.

Other

Entidements calculated at $500 per student.

1st year loan.

Total Revenues

II. Expenditures

Professional Salaries

School Directors

$60,000 salary for each School Director in first year. 4% yearly increase.

Administrators

$55,000 salaries for Curriculum Coordinator and Middle School Director added in year 3.

Teachers (FT)

8, 12, 16, 20 FT teachers @ an average of $45,000. 4% yearly increase.

Teachers (FT)

3, 4, 6, 7 PT teachers. 4% yearly increase.

$500 per student budgeted to cover staff and materials.

Payroll Taxes

Teachers will participate in Massachusetts Teachers' Retirement Fund. RCP matches remaining 3% payroll tax.

Benefits

$500 per month for medical benefits for each FT teacher and administrator.

Total Professional Salaries

Administrative Staff

Clerical

1 Secretary + 4% yearly increase.

Custodial

Maintenance contract.

PT Counselor

4% yearly increase.

PT Nurse

4% yearly increase.

PT Librarian

4% yearly increase.

PT Technology Specialist

4% yearly increase.

Payroll Taxes

7.65%

Benefits

12.50%

ToUl Administrative Staff

Facility

Rent

100 sq. ft. per student x $15 sq. ft. Assuming all renovations included in lease price. Could be lower with YouthBuild.

Debt Service

7% interest rate.

Utilities

100 sq. ft. per student x $2 sq. ft.

Total Facility

MateriaU/Supplies

Textbooks

$200 per student with old books being reused.

Instructional Equipment

$100 per student.

Office/Classroom Technology

1 comp. per teacher and for every 6 students. $1200 to buy and network. $20,000 software. 5 printers. All leased.

Library

Books and materials.

Office Furniture

$500 per administrator.

Classroom Furniture

$200 per student for 360 students. Leased over 5 years.

ToUl Materials/Supplies

Other Costs

Insurance

$100 per student.

Business Services 1 Based on contract with Beacon Education Management. |

Consultants

$500 per day for 10 days.

Marketing/Development

Approximate cost.

Staff Development/Training

$500 per teacher.

Transportation

$100 per student for field trips. BPS funds will cover other transportation costs.

Food Service

National School Lunch Program. 55% of students eat x 180 days x $2 cost x $1.80 reimbursement.

Curriculum Development

$2500 per month per teacher during summer (2 months in 1998, 1 month thereafter).

Printing and Copying

Approximate cost.

Student and Staff Recruitment

Approximate cost.

Travel/Transportation

Approximate cost.

Telephone/Fax/Postage

Approximate cost.

Contingency

Contingency.

Total Other Costs

Total Revenues

Previous Balance

Total Expenditures!

Balance!

IV. ACTION PLAN

Task

Due Date

Responsible
Party

Educational Program

•Refine goals, instructional and non-instructional programs, and
assessments

Ongoing

School staff

•Identify Special Education case manager

April

School Directors
(SD)

•Arrange case management and SPED training

April

•Hire curriculum consultant for summer and school-year planning

April

•Purchase educational materials and technology

May - Ongoing

School staff

•Identify students with EEPs; acquire records if possible

June - Ongoing

•Develop alternative lEPs & Individual Education Compacts with
students and families

June - Ongoing

School staff

•Host summer planning sessions

July - August

Financial Manaeement

•Collaborate with Beacon Education Management to manage
finances

Ongoing

Governance

•Continue recruiting and developing Board

Ongoing

Board

•Hold board meeting

March

Board

•Further define role of board members, relationship of board to
staff, and decision-making processes

March

Board

•Establish board calendar

March

Board

•Finalize by-laws

March

Board

•Arrange board liability insurance

March

Board

•Host Board retreat

June

SD & Board

Operations & Logistics

•Issue RFP and select vendor for insurance, maintenance, and food
services (if necessary)

March - May

•Secure transportation services

April

•Develop database for student reporting

June

SD & Beacon

•Establish attendance-record-keeping system

June

SD & Beacon

•Develop student and parent handbooks and student code of conduct

June

SD & Beacon

•Identify number of free and reduced-price lunch students

June - Ongoing

•Define route requirements if providing transportation

July

•Plan traffic management (drop-off/pick-up areas)

July

•Establish fire drill policy & schedule

July

SD & Beacon

•Develop Health & Safety policy handbook

July

SD & Beacon

•Identify medical/first aid resources

July

•Send medical forms to parents

July

•File completed medical forms

August

•Hold staff first-aid training

August

•Initiate Parent and Community Involvement Committee

August

•Recruit and coordinate parent and community volunteers

August - Ongoing

Task

Due Date

Responsible
Party

Site

•Finalize site

February - March

SD & Board

•Secure financing

February - March

SD & Beacon

•Sign lease or negotiate lease agreement

February - March

SD & Beacon

•Obtain property insurance

February - March

SD & Beacon

•Order furniture and equipment

May

•Secure final inspection

June

•Obtain occupancy certificate

June

•Acquire furniture & equipment

July

•Have building pre-inspected for code compliance

July

•Have drinking water tested

July

•Schedule fire inspection and building inspection

July

•Install technology

July

Staffing

•Advertise and disseminate job descriptions

February - Ongoing

•Interview candidates, conduct background checks, and begin hiring

March - Ongoing

•Develop staff handbook

June

SD & Beacon

•Hold initial faculty meetings

June

•Begin team-building

June

•Host summer planning sessions

July - August

Student Recruitment and Enrollment

•Publish brochure, ads, flyers, etc. (multilingual)

February

•Hold informational meetings for community

February - August

SD & Board

•Begin marketing school and recruiting students through schools,
social service agencies, churches, community organizations, radio
Public Service Announcements, door-to-door

February - August

•Conduct student/parent informational sessions

March - July

•Begin accepting applications

April

•Implement enrollment process

April - August

•Close applications

June

•Hold public lottery if oversubscribed

June

•Mail admission letters

June

•Collect admission replies

June

•Establish wait list

June

•Request student records from other schools

June

•Hold student/parent/teacher meetings

August

School staff

•Implement parent/family participation and involvement plans

August

•Open doors!!!!!!!!!!!

August

Everyone!!

Appendix A
RCP Student Standards

RCP Reading Standards'^

Comprehension

Students:

•identify the form and genre of a text;

•recognize the organizational elements of a text (table of contents, index, acts, scenes, chapters,

etc.);

•understand the sequence of a text (beginning, middle, end, foreshadowing, flashbacks, etc.);
•summarize or restate the main ideas or plot of a text;
•construct the meaning of a text;
•can explain how an author has used figures of speech, information, incidents, character, and

conflict to create an effect, thesis, or theme;
•describe conflict and resolution of conflict in literature;
•draw on a broad base of knowledge about American and world literature;
•draw on a broad base of knowledge about the themes, ideas, and lessons of religious texts and

classical literature.

Interpretation

Students:

•generate questions about a text;

•identify the author's purpose and point of view;

•distinguish fact from opinion;

•can evaluate the reliability of information conveyed in a text;

•analyze the positions taken in a text and the evidence offered in their support;

•compare and contrast different texts;

•make connections within and among texts;

•make connections between themselves and the texts;

•identify the historical and social context of a text;

•evaluate writing strategies;

•can explain and defend critical opinions about a text.

Process

Students:

•read for a variety of purposes—to make a decision, follow directions, select and record

information, analyze an argument, gain understanding, enjoy a good story, etc.
•skim or scan a text to choose a reading strategy that suits the material (highlighting, underlining,

taking notes, reading aloud, visualizing);
•identify and seek help with problems they have in reading;
•infer meanings of words from their context and look them up as needed;
•can find information that is helpful in evaluating the use of English by consulting dictionaries,

style sheets, handbooks, editing software, and other sources of information;
•use a reading log or journal to explore ideas;

•provide helpful information when reading and responding to the writing of others;
•discuss what they read with other readers.

RCP Writing Standards"^

Purpose

Students:

•communicate information, opinions, and experiences effectively when writing for various

audiences, in various genres, for various purposes,
•determine tiie purpose of a piece of writing, identify an appropriate audience, and develop a plan

to fulfill the purpose;
•produce a coherent and complete composition, containing sufficient detail to fulfill its purpose,

language appropriate for its audience, and a structure revealed through clear coordination and

subordination of ideas;
•construct a coherent argument that advances an opinion, accurately summarizes an opposing

opinion, refutes the opposing opinion, and cites reliable and persuasive evidence;
•write stories with a coherent plot, distinct characters, and conflict resolved through the action

characters.

Content

Students:

•bring each topic down to a manageable size;

•choose which ideas to develop and which to ignore;

•support ideas with sufficient details and evidence;

•use accurate evidence and cite sources when necessary.

Organization

Students:

•order ideas logically;

•capmre reader interest from the beginning;

•use transitions to connect ideas;

•bring each piece to an effective closing.

Stvle
Students:

•choose a genre (story, poem, letter, personal narrative, persuasive essay, etc.) and use the
conventions of the genre to further the purpose of the writing;
•use tones that serve their purposes;
•use techniques that serve their purposes;
•employ a style that sounds natural, honest, and direct;
•use words that create pictures;
•use clear and precise words;

•vary the rhythm and pace of sentences to suit their purposes;
•omit needless words.

Conventions
Students:

•understand parts of speech and fundamental rules of syntax and apply this knowledge in written
work;

•use correct spelling, capitalization, and puncmation;
•break conventions only with a purpose.

Process

Students:

•can employ a variety of strategies to evaluate, develop, and revise a topic;

•use computers for writing and revising drafts;

•use feedback from others to guide the process of revision;

•revise as many times as is necessary;

•reflect on their work.

RCP Public Speaking Standards'^

Content

Students:

•determine the purpose for speaking in various contexts, appraise the needs and expectations of an

audience, and make appropriate decisions about substance and style to help fulfill the purpose of a

speech;
•participate in or lead a discussion by understanding the purpose of a discussion, listening

attentively, respecting the opinions of other people, using language appropriate to the context,

asking questions, and offering relevant and reliable information;
•produce a coherent and complete presentation, containing sufficient detail to fulfill its purpose,

language appropriate for its audience, appropriate visual aids, and a structure revealed through

clear coordination and subordination of ideas;
•communicate information, opinions, and experiences effectively when speaking to various

audiences, in various contexts, for various purposes;
•communicate a clear message;
•construct coherent arguments that advance opinions, accurately summarize opposing opinions,

and cite persuasive and reliable evidence;
•provide accurate and substantive information;

•organizes information thoughtfully and in a way that allows presentations to progress;
•ensure that presentation aids are substantive, relevant, and used effectively;
•effectively employ rhetorical strategies (metaphor, imagery, repetition, etc.);
•answer questions knowledgeably and accurately.

Performance

Students:

•use literary and cultural allusions, imagery, various figures of speech, inflection and tone of

voice, non-verbal devices and gestures, humor, and visual aids to reinforce the message of a

speech or lecture;

•know the audience and engage it effectively;
•capture the audience's attention immediately;
•use appropriate body language and gestures;
•make eye contact with the audience;
•speak clearly and audibly and pronounce words correctly;
•speak at an appropriate pace;
•vary tone and language for expressive purposes;
•avoid "filler" words ("um," "uh," "like," "you know");
•defer to other speakers when appropriate;
•adjust to audience reactions;
•bring each presentation to an effective close.

Process

Students:

•employ a variety of strategies—lists, freewriting, word maps, and outlines, for example—to

evaluate, revise, and develop a topic;
•develop a speech or lecture through a series of drafts, using practice delivery and the responses of

a trial audience to guide the process of revision;
•use computers and presentation software to prepare and enhance the delivery of a speech or

lecture;

•are well-prepared for each presentation;
•reflect on their work.

Appendix B
RCP High School Course of Study

The High School Course of Study requires 20 year-long units of credit and includes 8 units of
Humanities (English and Social Sciences), 4 units of Mathematics, 3 units of Science, 3 units of
Spanish or ESL, 1 elective unit, and a Senior Year Internship and corresponding Writing and
College Workshop (1 unit). Students are also expected to participate on an athletic team during
their time at RCP.

Grade

Humanities
(English, Social Sciences, Fine Arts)

Science

Mathematics

Spanish

•English 101: World Literature

'Social Sciences 101: World Civilizations

•Biology

•Geometry
(UCSMP)

•Spanish

•English 201: American Literature
•Social Sciences 201: US History
•PSAT Review

•Chemistry

•Advanced Algebra
(UCSMP)
•PSAT Review

•Spanish

•Humanities 301: Critical Issues in
Contemporary Society
•Students address race, gender, class and
economics, politics, the legal system,
education, health care, and the environment
through reading, writing, lecture,
discussion, and exhibitions
•College professors design classes, lecture
to students, facilitate discussion, and
evaluate student exhibitions
•Students examine how these issues have
affected their lives and how they plan to
confront these issues in the future
•PSAT & SAT Review
•College Workshops (college visits, college
testing, admissions and financial aid
planning, career exploration)

•Physics

•Functions,
Statistics, and
Trigonometry
(UCSMP)

•PSAT & SAT
Review

•Spanish

•Writing 400 and College Workshops: Focus
on internship, college essay, and expository
and creative writing; college visits, college
testing, admissions and financial aid
planning, and career exploration

•Internships related to CICS study

& Two of the Following

•AP English

•AP US History

•Semester Electives (African-American
History & Literature, Latino History &
Literature, Civil Rights Movement, Women
Writers, Classics, etc.)

Possible Electives

•Independent Study, Study Abroad, Acting,
Playwriting, Directing, Drawing and
Composition, Painting, Photography,
Ceramics, Dance

Electives

•A.P. Chemistry

•A.P. Biology

•SAT Review

& One of the

Following

•Pre-calculus

•AP Calculus

Electives
•Spanish
•AP Spanish

Appendix C
RCP and James P. Timilty Critical Friends Network

Critical Friends Groups

The Annenberg Institute for School Reform established the National School Reform Faculty
Program and "Critical Friends Groups" based on the premise that "practitioners cannot change
without support; people need access to training, information, and ongoing assistance, if they are to
make major leaps in their effectiveness."'^ Unfortunately, professional teachers too often are
isolated from one another.

In order to encourage collaboration, reflective teaching, improved practice, and student
achievement, teacher teams at RCP and the James P. Timilty Public School will form Critical
Friends Groups within their own schools. In addition, a Critical Friends Network will be
established between RCP and Timilty to allow teachers to observe teaching and share ideas across
schools; the Network will be piloted with one sixth grade team from each school during the 1998-
99 school year. Inter- and intra-school collaboration will take place in daily team-meetings, Friday
afternoon professional development sessions, through e-mail correspondence, and during eight-
week summer planning sessions.

RCP and Timilty teachers and administrators benefit from the ideas, observations, expertise, and
resources of their colleagues. Critical Friends Groups share responsibility for improved practice
and student achievement by ensuring that curriculum, instruction, and assessments correspond
with student objectives and individual student needs. In addition to leaming from the knowledge
of their peers, teachers in Critical Friends Groups are exposed to information from research
articles, professional journals, conferences, and consultants.

Critical Friends Groups at RCP and Timilty ensure that teachers will:
•define standards for their students;
•define standards for their own teaching;

•evaluate whether teaching and curriculum are directly connected to student objectives;
•closely examine student work for evidence of student leaming and teaching effectiveness;
•closely examine their own work to evaluate their teaching effectiveness;
•leam from their colleagues and from outside sources;
•maintain portfolios that demonstrate their professional growth.

The establishment of Critical Friends Groups at RCP and Timilty begins with the training of
teachers and curriculum coordinators. These "coaches" leam facilitation skills to support trust-
building, team-building, and to support conversations about race/class/gender, standards for
student work, standards for teachers, and teaching and assessment methods. In addition, coaches
leam how to support fellow teachers during the evaluation process.

After coaches have been trained, teacher teams within each school function as Critical Friends
Groups. These groups meet several times each week to share observations, to provide feedback,
to develop standards, curriculum, and assessments, and to discuss teaching methods and student
issues. In addition, peer-coaching pairs observe each other at least once a month; each observation
includes a pre-conference and a post-conference.

During Critical Friends Group meetings, teachers share their own work to promote dialogue about
teacher efficacy and evidence of student leaming and achievement of goals. Coaches facilitate
Critical Friends Group meetings and connect teachers to outside educational resources, theory, and
information.

RCP and Timilty teachers maintain portfolios of their work. These portfohos have two primary
purposes: 1) they promote reflection and empowerment by requiring teachers to demonstrate
improvement and growth; 2) they hold RCP and Timilty accountable because they are presented to
Critical Friends Group peers inside and outside of each school.

RCP and Timilty teachers are held to high standards. Critical Friends Groups are designed to
ensure that teachers design their lessons and course around specified objectives for and the needs
of students. Teacher evaluations and classroom observations will assess a variety of factors that
are detailed in Appendix D.

RCP and Timilty hope to extend the Critical Friends Network and other collaborative ventures to
more district and charter schools in the future. In the meantime, RCP and Timilty strive to create a
model for positive and rewarding collaborations between charter and district schools.

Appendix D

RCP and James P. Timilty Critical Friends Group
Classroom Observation Form"
i

•Does the teacher seem to know his/her students well (what students know and can do, how
students learn, and what motivates students)?

•Does the teacher use multiple teaching strategies?

•Does the teacher use multiple motivation strategies?

•Does the teacher seem to know each student's level of knowledge and skill?

•Does the teacher maintain high expectations for all students? Are those expectations clearly
communicated to students?

•Is the teacher clear about a lesson's leaming goals?
a •Is the teacher clear about how the leaming will be assessed?

i 'Is the teacher clear about acceptable standards?

•If acquisition of a new skill is the goal, is the teacher explicit about the context in which this
skill will be used and why it is important to learn?
•Do students appear to be working hard?
•Does the teacher challenge students to work hard?

•Do all the components of the lesson reinforce the lesson's purpose and goals? Does coherence
exist between individual lessons, lessons and units, and the disciplines?
•Are the lesson's purpose and goals explicit?

•Do the components and activities of the lesson support the purpose and goals?
•Is the pace appropriately varied?
•Is curricular continuity evident?

•Is the lesson contextualized in a larger unit of study?

•Are past lessons referred to?

•Are future leaming goals referred to?

•Is the lesson connected to other disciplines?
•Is the homework consistent with the lesson's purpose and goals?
•Is the assessment consistent with the lesson's purpose and goals?
•Is the classroom arrangement consistent with the lesson's purpose and goals?
•What is on display in the room? Is it useful?

•Are students engaged and focused in class and on work outside of class?
•Do students contribute to discussions?

•Do students remain on task when working individually or in small groups?
•Does the teacher notice and draw into the lesson students who appear disengaged?
•Do students appear to be committed to out-of-class assignments?

•Is the classroom environment positive, supportive, motivating, and empowering?
•Do the teacher and students stay on task and use class time for the lesson?
•Do students keep each other on task?
I •Do students seem to have a positive attitude toward leaming?

•Does equitability among students seem to exist regardless of race/class/gender/physical
challenges?

•Is the teacher's management style supportive of positive culture?
•Do teacher/student and student/student interactions contribute to a positive culture?
I •What is on display in the room? Does it contribute to positive culture?

Appendix E
Tentative RCP Weekly Schedule for 5th Grade (1998-99)

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

7:00 - 7:55 AM

Optional Activities

8:00 - 8:05 AM

Advisory

8:10-9:05 AM

Math (Group A)

Science (Group B)

Humanities (Group C)

Humanities (Group D)

Math (Group A)

Science (Group B)

Humanities (Group C)

Humanities (Group D)

Math (Group A)

Science (Group B)

Humanities (Group C)

Humanities (Group D)

Math (Group A)

Science (Group B)

Humanities (Group C)

Humanities (Group D)

Math (Group A)

Science (Group B)

Humanities (Group C)

Humanities (Group D)

9:10- 10:05 AM

Math (Group B)

Science (Group A)

Humanities (Group C)

Humanities (Group D)

Math (Group B)

Science (Group A)

Humanities (Group C)

Humanities (Group D)

Math (Group B)

Science (Group A)

Humanities (Group C)

Humanities (Group D)

Math (Group B)

Science (Group A)

Humanities (Group C)

Humanities (Group D)

Math (Group B)

Science (Group A)

Humanities (Group C)

Humanities (Group D)

10:10 -
10:25 AM

Break

10:30 -
11:25 AM

Math (Group C)

Science (Group D)

Humanities (Group A)

Humanities (Group B)

Math (Group C)

Science (Group D)

Humanities (Group A)

Humanities (Group B)

Math (Group C)

Science (Group D)

Humanities (Group A)

Humanities (Group B)

Math (Group C)

Science (Group D)

Humanities (Group A)

Humanities (Group B)

Math (Group C)

Science (Group D)

Humanities (Group A)

Humanities (Group B)

11:30 AM -
12:25 PM

Math (Group D)

Science (Group C)

Humanities (Group A)

Humanities (Group B)

Math (Group D)

Science (Group C)

Humanities (Group A)

Humanities (Group B)

Math (Group D)

Science (Group C)

Humanities (Group A)

Humanities (Group B)

Math (Group D)

Science (Group C)

Humanities (Group A)

Humanities (Group B)

Math (Group D)

Science (Group C)

Humanities (Group A)

Humanities (Group B)

12:30- 1:00 PM

Lunch

1:05 -2:00 PM

Spanish (Group A)

Spanish (Group B)

P.E. (Groups C & D)

Spanish (Group A)

Spanish (Group B)

P.E. (Groups C & D)

Spanish (Group A)

Spanish (Group B)

P.E. (Groups C & D)

Spanish (Group A)

Spanish (Group B)

P.E. (Groups C & D)

Assembly

2:05 - 3:00 PM

Spanish (Group C)

Spanish (Group D)

P.E. (Groups A & B)

Spanish (Group C)

Spanish (Group D)

P.E. (Groups A & B)

Spanish (Group C)

Spanish (Group D)

P.E. (Groups A & B)

Spanish (Group C)

Spanish (Group D)

P.E. (Groups A & B)

Early Dismissal

3:00 - 4:00 PM

Reading Period/
Advisory

4:00 - 6:00 PM

Optional Activities

Appendix F
Key Roles Continued and Governance Structure

Division Directors

Once at full capacity, each division at RCP will have a Division Director. These lower school,

middle school, and high school principals will:

•manage student issues and discipline;

•supervise teachers;

•maintain connections with families;

•help with faculty recruitment and selection;

•handle other day-to-day issues.

Curriculum Coordinator

By the third year of operation, RCP will hire a Curriculum Coordinator to:

•observe, supervise, and provide feedback to teachers;
•attend grade-level team meetings;

•support teacher teams and work to ensure positive faculty dynamics;
•facilitate curriculum development sessions;

•coordinate the Critical Friends Network and other professional development activities;
•seek and share curriculum and instructional practices from other schools and
professional journals;

•help with faculty recruitment and selection;
•coordinate and oversee the Curriculum Committee.

Curriculum Committee

The Curriculum Committee will consist of the Curriculum Coordinator, Department Heads, and
Lead Teachers. The Committee will review the curriculum on an ongoing basis to ensure that
content and skill standards support the school's mission to prepare students for college and are
carefully coordinated within each grade level, across grade levels, and across departments. The
Committee also will consider grade-level and department recommendations and goals and make
final recommendations to the School Director(s).

Department Heads

Each subject area will have a Department Head to:

•facilitate curriculum revision, development, implementation, and assessment;
•ensure the department's scope and sequence is coherent and reflects the school's goals
for students;

•share content knowledge and effective instructional strategies
•purchase materials
•make recommendations to the Curriculum Committee

Lead Teachers

In addition to fulfilling all of the responsibilities required of other teachers, RCP's Lead Teachers
will assume responsibility for ensuring the effectiveness of grade-level teacher-teams. Lead
Teachers will facilitate grade-level Critical Friends Group Meetings.

Teachers

RCP teachers will:

•collaborate in grade-level Critical Friends Groups to improve curriculum and
instruction;

•observe colleagues and provide feedback;
•set individual and team goals and maintain teacher portfolios;
•provide individual support to students to promote student achievement;
•serve as advisors and maintain communication with families;
•integrate technology into the curriculum when appropriate;
•help manage student issues and discipline;
•help with faculty recruitment and selection;
•serve as coaches and in other capacities.

Director of Community Relations and After-School Programs

By year three, a Director of Community Relations and After-School Programs will be hired to:

•form and maintain partnerships with community agencies, Boston-area businesses,
local schools, and nationwide programs;
•maintain connections with families and parents;
•coordinate the Parent and Community Involvement Committee;
•supervise and evaluate all after-school, weekend, and summer programs;

College Counselor

A College Counselor will be hired in year five to:

•educate students and parents about the college and financial aid application processes;
•provide support throughout the college and financial aid application processes;
•coordinate and host college fairs and visits from college admissions representatives;
•coordinate student trips to colleges;
•provide intensive training to all students for college entrance exams.

Director of Critical Issues in Contemporary Society. Internships, and Alumni Affairs
The Director of Critical Issues in Contemporary Society, Internships, and Alumni Affairs will be
hired in year five to coordinate the junior year Humanities Course, corresponding Senior
Internships, and Alumni Affairs.

Other Roles

If RCP cannot secure pro-bono services, the school will hire a part time Counselor, Nurse,
Librarian, and Technology Specialist. In addition, the school will hire necessary food service and
maintenance staff.

•4-1*

>
o

•^-^
a

■^^

u
a

ui
<u

01)

'o
U

>->

^ .^< I

, e Ml

O 3^ 2

o 6 C2 Dh

U C C —

.in 5 O O

'-^ U J2 -c

i e

(3 E

^zz

•- O K>

£: 22 u
a- 2 .S

Appendix G
Summer Opportunities for Students

RCP strives to ensure that its students have positive and productive summertime experiences.
Although there are no mandatory summer "requirements" for RCP students, the school strongly
encourages students and their families to consider a wide range of options. RCP has established
nationwide partnerships to ensure that its students can participate in internships, attend camps, take
part in an Outward Bound adventures, attend academic enrichment programs, and teach at
Summerbridge programs. In addition, RCP middle school and high school students will have the
opportunity to participate in the school's separately funded Empower Boston program.

RCP's Empower Boston program, modeled after the nationwide Summerbridge program, prepares
middle school students for high school and attracts high school and college students to the teaching
profession. At Empower Boston, rising sixth and seventh grade students (from RCP, Timilty, and
other public schools) further their leaming and become better-prepared for rigorous high school
programs through summer enrichment classes taught by talented and dedicated local high school
and college students. The summer classes are skill-based and engage students through exposure to
new topics and through teaching conducted by positive young role models. Many of the high
school and college students will serve as tutors throughout the school year.

Summerbridge programs exist in more than thirty cities nationwide, including New York, Los
Angeles, Houston, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Miami, and Washington, D.C. Traditionally housed in
independent schools, all Summerbridge programs are based on a common theme: public middle
school students are eager to learn from the high school and college students who
serve as their teachers and mentors.

In addition to preparing middle school students for high school. Empower Boston benefits the high
school and college students who serve as teachers. The program directly addresses the concern
that "college and university schools of education are not giving teaching candidates more and better
hands-on experience in dealing with the kinds of real-life problems new teachers are sure to
meet."'^ At the beginning of each summer. Empower Boston teachers undergo an intensive week-
long training session. During training, the high school and college students learn from
professional teachers and professors, develop curriculum, present their lesson plans, and undergo
simulations. Throughout each summer, professional teachers observe classes, provide feedback,
and serve as mentors for these high school and college students who are interested in the teaching
profession.

Empower Boston brings the powerful Summerbridge model to Boston. In the summer of 2000,
the first group of RCP students will be taught by hard-working high school and college students
who will reaffirm that leaming is essential for one's future.

BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS

\-2. BOSTOITJLA. ^j

C OITDIIAJD. -W
•ff/t

r. J830. ^y

JAMES P. TiMILTY MIDDLE SCHOOL

"DEDICATED TO EXCELLENCE"
ROGER F, HARRIS
SHIRLEY GONSALVES Principal NORMA SOTO

Assistant Principal Director of Instruction

ipember 18, 1997

flbert V. Antonucci
ommissioner of Education
iassachusetts Department of Education
ine Ashburton Place, Room 1403
oston, MA 02105-1518

ear Commissioner Antonucci:

im writing to pledge my enthusiastic support fbrthe proposed Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School.

5 you know, it is my hope that Roxbury College Prep and the Timilty School will fbrge a close collaboration that will help
idge the gap between charter schools and Boston Public Schools. The innovative model of partnership will enrich education
the Roxbury community and provide students and teachers in both institutions with opportunities for individual and collective

3Wth.

e look forward to a variety of collaborative efforts with Roxbury College Prep. Our teachers will work together to develop
irriculum and share instructional methods. Teachers at both schools will be organized in Critical Friends Groups and will
lare best practices across schools. Tlmllty representatives also look fon/vard to assessing Roxbury College Prep's program
th other public school teachers and administrators. We recognize that this kind of partnership provides a chance for us to
am from each other, and we enthusiastically welcome this.

udents at the two schools will work together on a variety of programs and jxojects. For instance, students from Timilty and
oxbury College Prep will participate In the summer Empower Boston program. Timilty also will open its doors to include
oxbury College Prep students in our Citizen Schools program. In addition, students will have the chance to interact through
hietics and books clubs, among other extracurricular activities.

operation and collaboration are essential for the well-being of public education. I sincerely expect that the Timilty School
Kj Roxbury College Prep will provide a model for future partnerships between public schools.

)ger Hams

incipal, James P. Tln^lty Middle School

205 ROXBURY ST, JOHN ELIOT SQUARE, ROXBURY MASSACHUSETTS 02119 • 635-8109, FAX: 635-8115 • AREA 617

Printed on recycled paper

Harvard Project
on Schooling
and Children

126 Mount Auburn Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138' 570 1

telephone 617«496'3785 fax 617-495«1994
e-mail kay_nierseth@harvard.edu

Katherine K. Merseth Executive Director

January 5, 1997

Robert Antonucci
Commissioner
Department of Education

Dear Dr. Antonucci:

I write to express my strong support for the creation of the Roxbury College
Preparatory Charter School. I first became acquainted with one of the architects of this
school, Evan Rudall, when he enrolled in my graduate seminar, School Reform:
Curricular and Instructional Leadership, and later when he served as a Teaching Fellow
for my seminar Charter Schools: Threats or Opportunities to Public Education, offered
at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. I am a member of the faculty of the
Graduate School of Education and also serve as the Executive Director of the Harvard
Project on Schooling and Children, the university-wide initiative focused on the
learning and well-being of children. I have frequently discussed Evan's plans for
creating a model school for students from underprivileged areas. I think Evan
understands the issues and will deliver a fine product. In addition, the proposed
partnership vdth the Timilty Middle School forges wonderful, creative new links
between charter schools and traditional public schools.

I also wish to indicate the support of the Harvard Project on Schooling and Children to
this endeavor. The mission of the HPSC is to enhance children's learning and well-
being and to support the institutions and individuals crucial to that goal. It is in this
latter capacity that I offer the support of the Harvard Project on Schooling and Children
to this endeavor. I can imagine that the school will utilize several Harvard resources
and individuals at the Education School, the Kennedy School of Government, the
Business School and others from various academic disciplines.

I hope you will see the merit in the Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School, and
that you will give this application a most careful review. I find it extremely exciting and
look forward to my association with it.

Sincerely,

Katherine K. Merseth

DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS

Noi theaatcrn Univijrs ty, 104 Ell hail, Boston. N'A 021^5
6'. 7 -37 3.43 84 Fux 6 ' 7 3 ^'3.2542 TTY 6 : 7 .373 .7855

December 22, 1997

Robert V. Antonucci
Commissioner of Education
Massachusetts Department of Education
1 Ashburton Place, Room 1403
Boston, MA 02108

Commissioner Antonucci:

I write in strong support of Roxbury College Preparatory Ciiarter School's application for
charter school status.

As Dean of Student Semces at Northeastern University, I am committed to making
university resources available to Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School (RCP). To
help prepare Roxbury's siudents for higher education, Northeastern will provide tutors for
RCP's middle school and high school students, college tours, access to university-
professors, and support thi'oughout the college application process.

Through my association with Bridging Bridges and Concerned Black Men of
Massachusetts, I will ensure that RCP students have access to invaluable mentors and
positive out-of-schooi programming.

I value the opportunity to support an institution so committed to furthering educational
opportunities in Roxbur}'. I look forv.'ard to helping Roxbuiy College Preparatory
Charter School build a bridge to Northeastern University and community-based groups.

Sincerely,

J. Keith Motley /
Dean of Student

TDTfit P _ £7!7

YouthBuild
Boston

January 2, 1998

Evan Rudall
6 Kingley Street
Allston, MA02B4

Dear Evan,

On behalf of YoutliBuild Boston, 1 ain proud to support the Roxbury Coltege Preparatory Charter
School. Educational resources such as the Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School are in
great need in the greater Roxbury community.

YouthBuild Boston is committed to assisting the Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School
secure a location by advocating with the Public Facility Department on the part of Roxbury
-College Preparatory Charter School. In addition, YouthBuild Boston, as a construction resource,
will be available to provide any rehabilitation that the acquired site might require.

As a similar organization serving young people in the greater Roxbury community, YouthBuild
Boston welcomes all opportunities to help our young people help other young people as a
valuable tool for leadership development.

Sincerely,

Ken Smith
Executive Director

173 A Norfolk Avenue Roxhmy, MA 02\T9 - 617-44S-aB87 ^ fax 427-3950

Appendix I
Resumes of RCP Founders and List of Advisors

Advisors

RCP's advisors include:

Barney Brovi^er: Director Program for Educational Change Agents, Tufts University

Phil Caputo, Esq.: Executive Director, Ennis William Cosby Foundation

Dr. William H. Cosby, Jr.: Educator and Entertainer

Paula Elliot: Curriculum Developer, The Efficacy Institute

Leo Flanagan: Academy Director for the Junior Academy, Boston Renaissance Charter School

Sara Lawrence-Lightfoot: Author; Professor of Education, Harvard University

Dick Mason: Interim Director of Economic Development, Urban Edge

Ledyard McFadden: Northeast Regional Manager, Beacon Education Management

Katherine Merseth: Executive Director, Harvard Project on Schooling and Children

Alima Newton: BPS Parent and Roxbury Resident

Caroline Olivier: Educational Director, Ennis William Cosby Foundation

Robert S. Peterkin: Director, Urban Superintendents Program and Francis Keppel

Senior Lecturer on Education, Harvard University

Earl Phalen: Executive Director, The Bell Foundation

Ted Preston: Student, Harvard Graduate School of Business

Mike Sabin: Teacher, Amigos Program, John F. Kennedy School

Dr. Cornel West: Professor of Afro- American Studies and Professor of Philosophy

of Religion, Harvard University

JOSEPHINE M, CORRO
49 Thurston Road

Newton, MA 02164
617 969-0767 Home
617 423-3755 Work

Qualifications

• Twenty years experience facilitating education "mnovations in public
schools K- Continuing Professional Development.

•Effectively and consistently engaging and influencing educators and
key commurtity leaders.

• Creating col!aboralioa5 that strategically match needs and rcsnurccs.

• Providing leadership, creativity and follow through for tlie
succc^ssful conceptualization of dynamic parlnerships.

Experience

PARTNERSHIP MAN ACER Boston Private Industry Council 19S7-Preftenl

Manage the citywide coordination of over 60 school-business partnerships with Boston Public
Schools.

Conducted community outreach in the development of a strategic plan for the new Boston
Compact^ an agreement on educational reform goals by Boston's major leaders.

Initiated Boston Public School middle and elementary school- business parincrships.

Developed extensive and varied business support for School Based Management Tr.iininj^.

Secured funding and business support for founding three National Academy f-oundation school
to work programs; Travel and Tourism, Finance and Public Service.

Conceptualized and wrote proposals for funding new programs including Green Tech, an
environmental school -to- career program.

Developed and wrote partnership workbook, developed educational and career related
materials.

Conducted training, facilitated meetings and provided technical assistance to partnerships
resulting in more eltecUve practices.

DIRECTOR, CORPOK^TE TRAINING Northeastern University' 1985-87

State of the Art Engineering Program

Developed and administered high tech seminar series thai traveled to major cities
nationally resulting in substantial new revenues for the program.

Responsible for promoting stale of the art engineering courses to higb lech compai-iie<;.

Interviewed and hired faculty for evening and seminar programs.

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS Northeastern Univ^irsily l'>83-83
Career Development and Placement

Assessed technical employment needs with Managers of Information Systems or Pei-sonnol
Offices in high lech companies.

Developed job component of the first Masters Degree level Cooperative Educnlior^
program resulting iii 100% placement.

PROGRAMCOORDINATOR The NETWORK, Inc. And over, MA 1980-8.^
Project Tnler-Aclion

Coordinated activities for one of five national educational sex equity projects funded by
the U.S. Department of Education through the Women's Educational Equity Act.

Developed and pri^sented training sessions on team building, effective pbnning for
change and equity issues at both national and regional conferences.

Resourced equitable curriculum materials and developed training packets.

Facilitated school-community groups resulting in uniquely designed event? for each school.

Wrote grants and proposals.

GUIDANCE COUNSELOR Bonny Eagle High School, West Buxton, MM t973-l%0

Mt. Ararat School, Topsham, ME

Counseled students individually and in groups concerning academic and ptrsonal plrms.

Developed innovative educational programs in response to institutional and individual needs.

ADMISSIONS COUNSELOR AND PUBLIC INFORMATION OFHCER l^>70-7.^

St. Joseph's College, No. Windham, ME

Developed an admissions recruiting program resulting in increased co-ed enrtjllmcnl

Established public relations office, developed media contacts and alumni news sheet.

EDUCATION

1580-82 Radcliffe College, Management Program: 1970-72 University of Maine

Organizational Behavior Courses M.Ed. Guidance and Counseling

1966-70 St. Joseph's College B, A. Sod3l Sciences

PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

Author, FAI R FOR ALL: School s Celebrate Equity. Co - Author, Problem Solvin g Ski lls for

IM LKSE CT dnteractiun.s F or Sex Equity in Classroom T e aching ) Co-Developer, Makin g Chan ge lor

Sch ool Im prov ement The NETVN^ORK, INC., Andover, *MA 1983.

MEMBER

Massachusetts Commission on Time and Learning

19S7-1990 Statewide School-Ousincss Partnership Committee

Chair, Advisory Committee of the Higher Education Information Center

Greater Boston One to One Mentoring -Provider Croup

EDUCATION:

ROGER F. HARRIS

27 Faunce Road

Boston, Massachusettts 02126

H: (617) 298-2097 W: (617) 635-8109

Presently

1987-1988
1977 - 1980

1972 - 1974

1970 - 1972

Boston College, Graduate School of Arts & Science
Doctoral Candidate, 1997

Boston University, Boston Leadership Academy

Boston State College, Masters Degree,
Educational Administration

Boston University, Bachelor of Science Degree,
Human Movement & Health Education

McCook College, Associate of Arts
McCook, Nebraska

MILITARY EXPERIENCE:

1966 - 1969

United States Marine Corps, Combat Duty Vietnam
Honorable Discharge

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE;

1989 - Present
1995 - Present
1987-1989
W77 - 1987

1976 - 1977

1974 - 1976

AFFILIATIONS

James P. Timilty Middle School, Principal

Curry College, Adjunct Faculty Member

Robert Gould Shaw Middle Sdiool, Principal

West Roxbury High Sdiool, Assistant Head Master,
Dean of Discipline, House Master, Teacher,
Coach (Football, Basketball, Track & Field)

Roslindale High School, Teacher (Physical Education
and Health), Coach (Football)

Hyde Park High School, Teacher (Physical Education
and Health), coach (Football)

Former President of The Black Educator's Alliance of Massachusetts,
Charles St. A.M.E. Church, Former Chairman of the Boy Scouts
of America Greater Boston Council (Heritage District), VFW,
Nat'l Association of Secondary School Principals, Phi Delta Kappa,
Vietnam Veterans Benefits Clearing House Board of Directors,
Boston Public Schools Guidance Counseling Task Force,
Code of Discipline Revisory Committee, Freedom House,
Director of the Boston Equal Rights League, Thompson Island
Educational Advisory Committee, Community Center School

Advisory Board, Member of the Massachusetts Commission on
Time and Leaming, Member of the Massachusetts Green
Ribbon Commission, Citizen Schools Advisory Board, and
Coming Up Strong Advisory Board

AWARDS/HONORS 1993 URBAN LEAGUE OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

"PRESIDENT'S AWARD"

1992 MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY
"MEN OF VISION AWARD"

1992 BLACK EDUCATOR'S ALLIANCE OF MASSACHUSETTS
"EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AWARD"

1991 BLACKS IN GOVERNMENT. BOSTON CHAPTER
"APPRECIATION AWARD"

1991 BOSTON URBAN BANKER'S FORUM
"EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AWARD"

1991 VETERAN'S BENEFITS CLEARINGHOUSE
"OUTSTANDING VETERAN ACHIEVEMENT AWARD"

1990 POINT OF LIGHT AWARD

PRESENTATIONS 1 996 Harvard University, Guest Lecturer

1996 Boston College, Guest Lecturer

1993 Harvard University, Harvard Leadership Academy
(Invited Presenter On "The Role Of The Principal/Advocate")

1993 Youth Worker's Alliance of Boston

(Invited Speaker On "The Importance Of Youth Workers")

(Collaborating With Schools)

1993 Department of Labor

(Guest Speaker on Inner- City Excellence In Education)

1992 Blacks In Government (Boston Chapter)
(Keynote Address)

1992 University of Massachusetts At Boston

(Invited Speaker On Iimer-City Excellence In Education)

1992 Nation of Islam

(Invited Speaker On Coming Together To Stop Violence

In The Black Community)

1992 Massachusetts State Senate

(Invited Speaker On "Restructuring Schools For Success",

Extended Day/Extended Year)

1992 John F. Kennedy Memorial Library, Horace Mann

BIOGRAPHY

J. Keith Motley

Dean for Student Services

Norttieastern University

James Keith Motley was born in Pittsburgh, the son of John
W» and Cornelia H. Motley. He attended the public schools there
and while at Peabody High school captained the basketball team
and was first violinist in the school orchestra-

Prior to attending Northeastern where he received both the
Bachelor of Science and Master of Education Degrees, Dean Motley
graduated from the University of Pittsburgh's Upward Bound
Program .

At Northeastern he distinguished himself not only as a
scholar, but as a vital member of the basketball team. He
lettered four years and was captain in his final year. During
his student days he was also a meinber and subseqiaent president of
Iota Phi Theta Fraternity and has served as the New England
Regional Director of that fraternity.

Recipient of numerous awards as a student, among them the
African-American Institute Director's Award as the most
outstanding Black senior, and the Amilcar Cabral Award, He was
also honored in 198 3 as a Greater Boston YMCA Black Achiever and
in 198 4 as an Outstanding Young Men of America recipient. Dean
Motley received the Black Educators Alliance of Massachusetts
Education Award 1985, The National Black Student Association
honored him with the Positive Force Award (1984, 198 5 and 198 6) .
In 198 9 Dean Motley received a citation from the Massachusetts
House of Representatives for contributions to minorities in
higher education, a Resolution from the Boston City Council for
contributions to minority in higher education and The American
Association of Health, Physical Education and Recreation
Community Service Award. The Urban League Guild of Eastern
Massachusetts honored him with their Education Award. Omega Psi
Phi Fraternity presented him with their prestigious Carter G,
Woodson Hiomanitarian Award, Phi Theta Kappa presented him with
their Outstanding Service Award. Recently, he has received the
Museum of Afro-American History 32 Men of Vision Award, the
Harvard Street Neighborhood Health Center Black Male Life Center
Community Service Award and the Disability Resource Center
presented him with their Dedicated Advocate Award for work with
the Deaf Student Association.

Dean Motley's career with Northeastern began in the
Department of Admissions where he coordinated the admission
process for the College of Criminal Justice and the College of
Business as well as all minority programs.

After his appointment to the position of Assistant
D^san/ Director of Minority student Affairs in 1982, His

JAMES KEITH MOTLEY
Page Two

responsibilities included academic monitoring of all minority
students. Under his direction several programs to assist
students both academically and financially have been developed,
and are ongoing at the University, He is directly responsible
for the institution of the Dean's Honor Roll Scholars Awards
dinner where freshmen who make the Dean's List are honored. In
addition, he began an annual Oratory Competition where winning
competitors are awarded not only certificates, but financial
assistance as well. Under his tutelage and the auspices of his
office, students attend a career conference where they can speak
with alumni and learn about employment opportunities in their
fields of study. Dean Motley also authored the original proposal
that has enabled 300 students, administrators, and faculty
members from 16 Greater Boston Universities to hold a three day
conference each year to discuss strategies to combat student
retention.

In October, 1987, Keith was appointed Associate Dean and
Director of the African-American Institute. His responsibilities
included managing the three story building which houses a
Cultural /Recreation Center, Counseling Component, Reading,
Wilting fit Otudy Clcillc Faculty, Tutoring Prngrrim, Project Uiima
Compensatory Education Program, Mini Resource Center, Library and
Study/ Conference Rooms.

In January, 1993, Keith was appointed Dean of Student
Services. riis new respoix^ibillties include i management oversight
of the Disability Resource Center, International- Student .Office,
International Student center, English Laiiguage Center, Academic
Advisement of Athletes, Boston Housing Authority Grant Program,
Minority Student Affairs, and the John D. O' Bryant African-
American Institute.

Dean Motley also coaches on a part-time basis the
championship basketball team as well. Because of his efforts,
95% of the athletes on scholarship graduate.

In addition to the Northeastern Huskies going to the NCAA's
for seven years, his under 19 years of age basketball team from
Roxbury's Cooper Community Center won the 1982 Championship, and
his 1986 Boston Men's Open Basketball team won the Bay State
Games, feats Keith is particularly proud of.

Keith is very active in his community serving as a member of
the Board of Directors of the Roxbury YMCA, the Urban League of
Eastern Massachusetts, Massachusetts Bay State Games Scholarship
Program, the Concerned Black Men of Massachusetts, Inc. , and the
Advisory Board for the Sports Museum of New England.

Keith is chairman of the Concerned Black Men of
Massachusetts Education committee and project director for the
Paul Robeson Institute for Positive Self -Development, a Saturday
learning experience developed to assist Black males in grades
three through six in their ascension towards manhood.

Keith is also a Board member of the Reggie Lewis Foundation
and serves as a spokesperson for its' President/CEO Donna Harris
Lewis .

Michele Renae Pierce

14 Mayfair Streey
Roxbury, MA 02119
617-445-2327

EDUCATION: HARVARD UNIVERSITY CAMBRIDGE, MA

Graduate School of Education, M.Ed. 1995

Administration, Planning and Social Policy Ed.D. CANDIDATE
Merit based full-tuition award.

STANFORD UNIVERSITY STANFORD, CA

Stanford Teacher Education Program M.A. 1992

Irvine Fellowship— merit based full tuition award.

WESLEY AN UNIVERSITY MIDDLETOWN, CT

Double Major:English/Afro-American Studies B.A. 1991

SCHOOL FOR INTERNATIONAL TRAINING KENYA, AFRICA

January -June 1990

FIELDSTON ETHICAL CULTURE SCHOOL RIVERDALE, N.Y.

Class of 1987

EXPERIENCE:

HARVARD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION SPRING 1997
Teaching Fellow: Course entitled T-131 Teachers, Leadership and Power: School
Reform From The Classroom with Katherine Boles. Responsibilities included: Revising
course from last year, weekly planning sessions with professor, teaching
responsibilities (leading full class discussions on literature), grading papers and
collaborative projects, consulting with students on their written work.

HARVARD UNIVERSITY: PROJECT ZERO SEPT 1995- JUNE 1996

Research Intern: Worked with Project Zero/Massachusetts School Network
collaborative on an implementation of portfolio assessment. Responsibilities included:
extensive observation and interviewing of teachers from six public schools, writing
of two teacher biographies for publication.

DORCHESTER YOUTH COLLABORATIVE SPRING 1996

Educational Consultant: Worked as an academic advisor for three high school
students who have just starred in a major motion picture about Urban Youth and
post-traumatic stress disorder entitled "Squeeze". (Release date:Summer 1997,
Mirimax.)

CLARK & WEINSTOCK SUMMER 1995

Senior Researcher: Corporate/Public School Partnership Project for New York
City Consulting Firm. Responsibilities included: qualitative research and data
analysis, writing of a case study on Minneapolis as a model of success in public
school partnerships.

SUMMERBRIDGE NEW HAVEN SEPT 1 992-SEPT 1 994

Summerbridge Director: Founding director of Summerbridge New Haven, an
academic enrichment program for inner-city youth. The goals of the program are
twofold: "getting younger students into learning and older students into teaching."
(Newsweek) Administrative responsibilities included: major fundraising and budget
management, hiring and overseeing a staff of twenty-five high school and college

teachers, recruiting students from six public schools in New Haven, consulting with
families of students on placement into academically rigorous high school programs,
curricular development and training for Saturday School during the academic year,

creating and cultivating a Board of Directors which included Marian Wright
Edelman, Dr. William H. Cosby Jr., and Dr. James Comer.

EVAN RUDALL

205 Roxbury Street
Roxbury, MA 02119

(617) 285-5209
evanrudall@aol.coni

ilDUCATION: Harvard University Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA

Master of Education in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy, June, 1997
Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT
Bachelor of Arts in Government, May, 1992

ERTIFICATION:

assachusetts Teacher Certification in Social Studies (5-9) and Middle School (5-9), November, 1996
assachusetts Middle School Principal Certification, July, 1997

ADMINISTRATIVE AND TEACHING EXPERIENCE:

1997 to Consultant . INDEPENDENT AND CHARTER SCHOOLS Boston, MA and Chicago, IL

1998 Served as Director of Roxbury College Preparatory Charter School's founding team. Worked with parents, educators,
community organizations, and business leaders to found a K-12 charter school. Oversaw all aspects of school design
including development of standards, curriculum, and assessments, facility search, and community outreach. Established
board of directors, professional development and school accountability plans, and school budget. Also hired by Francis ,W.
Parker School and The University of Chicago Laboratory Schools to found Summerbridge program for Chicago Public
Middle School students. Wrote grants to foundations and corporations to raise $120,000 yearly budget.

1996 to Principal Apprentice . JAMES P. TIMILTY PUBLIC MIDDLE SCHOOL Roxbury, MA

.1997 Assisted Middle School Principal in assessment and administration of Blue Ribbon Boston Public School. Authored

Pilot School proposal to found Timilty High School. Participated in weekly administration meetings and daily grade-
level meetings. Observed teaching and evaluated curriculum. Fulfilled Massachusetts Principal Certification requirements.

1996 to Teaching Fellow . HARVARD UNIVERSITY and LESLEY COLLEGE Cambridge, MA

1997 Collaborated with Harvard professor to design and co-teach course entided, "Charter Schools and Pilot Schools." Worked
with Lesley professor to redesign and co-teach course entitled, "Middle School Philosophy, Curriculum, and Instruction."
Chose curriculum materials, facilitated discussion, and assessed student work in both courses.

1995 to Assistant Middle School Director . KENTUCKY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL Louisville, KY

1996 Assisted the Middle School Director in directing the middle school program. Oversaw discipline issues. Developed and
implemented enrichment activities for fifth - eighth grade students that included weekly student-run assemblies and
periodic community workshops and programs. Tracked student performance and student issues. Worked with class
sponsors to plan trips and retreats. Instituted Middle School Student Council.

1993 to Faculty Member . KENTUCKY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL Louisville, KY

1996 Designed and taught new seventh grade world geography curriculum. Collaborated with seventh grade teachers to create

an integrated and multicultural curriculum. Coached middle school basketball and soccer teams and varsity tennis team.

Served as advisor for twelve seventh graders. Taught seventh grade history and computer classes as first-year teacher.

1993 to Director . SUMMERBRIDGE LOUISVILLE Louisville, KY

1995 Solicited funds from and wrote grants to foundations and corporations to sustain $100,000 yearly budget. Recruited

public middle school students to participate in year-round tutorials and intensive six-week summer academic enrichment
program. Recruited and trained high school and college students to teach student-centered enrichment classes. Counseled
and advised middle school students and their parents. Served as National Admissions Coordinator for thirty
Summerbridge programs. Developed and published program materials.

1993 to Consultant . KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Louisville, KY

1995 Trained teachers and administrators from Kentucky Department of Education to include the Summerbridge model as a

component of Kentucky Education Reform Act. Provided on-going support and training to teachers and administrators

from four rural schools that hosted successful Summerbridge-modeled "Empower Kentucky" programs. Co-produced a

television documentary that featured Summerbridge Louisville and Empower Kentucky.

1992 Orientation Coordinator. Dean's Office Intern . WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY Middletown, CT
Planned and implemented New Student Orientation for 800 students. Developed and coordinated social and educational
programs involving students, faculty, administration, and staff. Trained to facilitate prejudice-awareness workshops.
Managed $60,000 budget. Created twenty-eight page guidebook for new students.

1991 to Senior Interviewer . WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY Middletown, CT

1992 Interviewed and evaluated prospective students. Led group information sessions and campus tours for applicants and
parents. One of six seniors selected to represent Admissions Office for the summer, fall, and spring months.

1991 to Head Teaching A pprentice . WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY Middletown, CT

1992 Coordinated eight student-run seminars and designed curriculum for seventy-five undergraduates. Facilitated class
discussions and critiqued student response to written questions on a weekly basis.

CHERYL LYNN WATSON

13 Marina Way Drive

Sewaren, NJ 07077

(908) 634-1525

education

1996-1997 HARVARD UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION CAMBRIDGE, MA

Awarded Ed.M. Concentration in administiration, plarming and social policy.
Principal Certification Pattern.

Summer COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TEACHERS COLLEGE NEW YORK, NY

1994-1996 Awarded Advanced Writing Process Institute Certificate.

1989-1993 MARYMOUNT COLLEGE TARRYTOWN, NY

Awarded Bachelor of Science in Education. G.P.A. in Major 3.85/4.0.

Honors: Cum Laude. Dean's List for four semesters. Recipient of the Juliet Creedon Endowed

Scholarship.

Fall 1992 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO CAIRO, EGYPT

Study Abroad Program (15 credits earned).

certification

New York State Common Branch K - 6 and New York City Common Branch K - 6.
New York State and Massachusetts Principal Certificate (N-5 and 5-9).

professional experience

JAMES P. TIMILTY MIDDLE SCHOOL ROXBURY,MA

Spring 1997 Principal Apprentice. Grades 6-8. Shadowed school building principal. Attended
administrative. School Board, Cluster and School Based Management Team meetings. Assisted
in improving staff development workshops.

LONGFELLOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAMBRIDGE, MA

Spring 1997 Principal Apprentice. Grades K-8. Shadowed school building principal. Organized and
supervised school mentoring program. Assisted with school budget. Monitored school
curriculum. Assisted in improving parent voltinteer roles in school.

Summer 1996 SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES (S.EO.) BROOKLYN, NY

Team Leader. Grade 7 and grade 8.
Supervised and implemented "World of Work" Summer Institute.

THADDEUS STEVENS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BROOKLYN, NY

Fall 1995- Teacher. Grades K-3 Ungraded Primary Program.
Spring 1996 Supervise entire instructional day programs. Organize total class learning experiences. Prepare

and implement daily lesson plans. Utilize different models of teaching and evaluation.

• Whole Language

• Cooperative learning

• Madeline Hunter's Model

• Performance - Based Assessment

• Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligence

• Bloom's Taxonomy

Attended faculty, E.P.C., P.P.C, and departmental meetings. Member of the Comer Project School
Based Management Assessment Team and school wide social committee. U.F.T. Delegate.
Nominated for Mayoral Recognition Award for excellent new teachers.

Fall 1993- Teacher. Grade 2, Heterogeneous Maii\sb:eam Classroom.
Spring 1995

Endnotes

'Data gathered from the 1997 Stanford 9 Achievement Test Results, using Roxbury-area schools (elementary: Ellis,
Emerson, Hale, Higginson, Mason, Mendell, and Tobin; middle: Dearborn, Lewis, Tobin and Wheatley).
No 1997 data were available on 3rd grade reading scores, so 1996 data were used here. See Office of
Research, Assessment, and Evaluation. Boston Public Schools. "Stanford 9: Achievement Test (Part 1).
System and School Level Results - Spring 1997 Performance Levels."

^Modern Red Schoolhouse Institute. "Design Document" (Indianapolis: Hudson Institute, 1996): p. 2.

^T.inHa DarHng-RammnnH The Right to Leam (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997): p. 74.

''Modem Red Schoolhouse Institute. "May We Help You?" (Nashville).

^Finlay McQuade and David W. Champagne. How to Make a Better School (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1995).

%n Saphier and Robert Gower. The Skillful Teacher (Carlisle, MA: Research for Better Teaching, Inc., 1997) p.

460.
'Modern Red Schoolhouse Institute. "Design Document" (Indianapolis: Hudson Institute, 1996): p. 10.
"Modem Red Schoolhouse Institute. "Design Document" (Indianapolis: Hudson Institute, 1996): p. 11.
''Massachusetts Department of Education. "Advisory Opinion on Student Discipline" p. 4.
'"Lucy Knight. Knight Consulting, Evanston, IL.

"Robert Simons. "Control in an Age of Empowerment" (Boston: Harvard Business Review, March/April, 1995).
'^Finlay McQuade and David W. Champagne. How to Make a Better School (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1995) p.

217.
'^Adapted from Modem Red Schoolhouse (Nashville) and Francis W. Parker Charter School (Fort Devons, MA).
'"Adapted from Modern Red Schoolhouse (Nashville) and Francis W. Parker Charter School (Fort Devons, MA).
'^Adapted from Modern Red Schoolhouse (Nashville) and Francis W. Parker Charter School (Fort Devons, MA).
"'Annenberg Institute for School Reform. Brown University, Providence.
'^Annenberg Institute for School Reform. Brown University, Providence.
'"The Public School Forum of North Carolina. "A Profession in Jeopardy" p. 5.

Internet Archive Audio

Featured

Top

Images

Featured

Top

Software

Featured

Top

Books

Featured

Top

Video

Featured

Top

Mobile Apps

Browser Extensions

Archive-It Subscription

Save Page Now

Full text of "1998 charter school applications"

See other formats